[PATCH 4/6 v6] acpi/ghes: Add helper for CXL protocol errors checks
Fabio M. De Francesco
fabio.m.de.francesco at linux.intel.com
Wed Nov 5 04:41:04 AEDT 2025
On Tuesday, October 28, 2025 3:54:15 PM Central European Standard Time Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 14:25:39 +0200
> "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Move the CPER CXL protocol errors validity out of
>
> validity check
>
> > cxl_cper_post_prot_err() to cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid() and limit the
>
> to new cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid()
>
> as otherwise it sounds like it already exists.
>
> > serial number check only to CXL agents that are CXL devices (UEFI v2.10,
> > Appendix N.2.13).
>
> Perhaps a little more here on why. I assume because you are going to have
> a second user for it, but good to say that. Also serves to justify the
> export.
>
Hi Jonathan,
All the corrections you made will be applied to the next version.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fabio.m.de.francesco at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > include/cxl/event.h | 10 ++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> > index d6fe5f020e96..e69ae864f43d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> > @@ -706,30 +706,42 @@ static DEFINE_KFIFO(cxl_cper_prot_err_fifo, struct cxl_cper_prot_err_work_data,
> > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cxl_cper_prot_err_work_lock);
> > struct work_struct *cxl_cper_prot_err_work;
> >
> > -static void cxl_cper_post_prot_err(struct cxl_cper_sec_prot_err *prot_err,
> > - int severity)
> > +int cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid(struct cxl_cper_sec_prot_err *prot_err)
>
> Useful to return an error number? Or would a bool be better given it is either
> valid or not?
>
I prefer to return more information when reasonable and leave the callers free
to use or ignore the specific error number.
Fabio
>
> Otherwise looks good to me,
>
> Jonathan
>
> > {
> > - struct cxl_cper_prot_err_work_data wd;
> > - u8 *dvsec_start, *cap_start;
> > -
> > if (!(prot_err->valid_bits & PROT_ERR_VALID_AGENT_ADDRESS)) {
> > pr_err_ratelimited("CXL CPER invalid agent type\n");
> > - return;
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > if (!(prot_err->valid_bits & PROT_ERR_VALID_ERROR_LOG)) {
> > pr_err_ratelimited("CXL CPER invalid protocol error log\n");
> > - return;
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > if (prot_err->err_len != sizeof(struct cxl_ras_capability_regs)) {
> > pr_err_ratelimited("CXL CPER invalid RAS Cap size (%u)\n",
> > prot_err->err_len);
> > - return;
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!(prot_err->valid_bits & PROT_ERR_VALID_SERIAL_NUMBER))
> > - pr_warn(FW_WARN "CXL CPER no device serial number\n");
> > + if ((prot_err->agent_type == RCD || prot_err->agent_type == DEVICE ||
> > + prot_err->agent_type == LD || prot_err->agent_type == FMLD) &&
> > + !(prot_err->valid_bits & PROT_ERR_VALID_SERIAL_NUMBER))
> > + pr_warn_ratelimited(FW_WARN
> > + "CXL CPER no device serial number\n");
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid);
> > +
> > +static void cxl_cper_post_prot_err(struct cxl_cper_sec_prot_err *prot_err,
> > + int severity)
> > +{
> > + struct cxl_cper_prot_err_work_data wd;
> > + u8 *dvsec_start, *cap_start;
> > +
> > + if (cxl_cper_sec_prot_err_valid(prot_err))
> > + return;
> >
> > guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&cxl_cper_prot_err_work_lock);
> >
>
>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list