[patch V5 10/12] futex: Convert to get/put_user_inline()
Christophe Leroy
christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu
Tue Nov 4 17:31:05 AEDT 2025
Le 27/10/2025 à 09:44, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
>
> Replace the open coded implementation with the new get/put_user_inline()
> helpers. This might be replaced by a regular get/put_user(), but that needs
> a proper performance evaluation.
>
> No functional change intended
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart at infradead.org>
> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave at stgolabs.net>
> Cc: "André Almeida" <andrealmeid at igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu>
> ---
> V5: Rename again and remove the helpers
> V4: Rename once moar
> V3: Adapt to scope changes
> V2: Convert to scoped variant
> ---
> kernel/futex/core.c | 4 +--
> kernel/futex/futex.h | 58 ++-------------------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> ---
> --- a/kernel/futex/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex/core.c
> @@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ int get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, uns
> if (flags & FLAGS_NUMA) {
> u32 __user *naddr = (void *)uaddr + size / 2;
>
> - if (futex_get_value(&node, naddr))
> + if (get_user_inline(node, naddr))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> if ((node != FUTEX_NO_NODE) &&
> @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ int get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, uns
> node = numa_node_id();
> node_updated = true;
> }
> - if (node_updated && futex_put_value(node, naddr))
> + if (node_updated && put_user_inline(node, naddr))
> return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> --- a/kernel/futex/futex.h
> +++ b/kernel/futex/futex.h
> @@ -281,63 +281,11 @@ static inline int futex_cmpxchg_value_lo
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * This does a plain atomic user space read, and the user pointer has
> - * already been verified earlier by get_futex_key() to be both aligned
> - * and actually in user space, just like futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic().
> - *
> - * We still want to avoid any speculation, and while __get_user() is
> - * the traditional model for this, it's actually slower than doing
> - * this manually these days.
> - *
> - * We could just have a per-architecture special function for it,
> - * the same way we do futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(), but rather
> - * than force everybody to do that, write it out long-hand using
> - * the low-level user-access infrastructure.
> - *
> - * This looks a bit overkill, but generally just results in a couple
> - * of instructions.
> - */
> -static __always_inline int futex_get_value(u32 *dest, u32 __user *from)
> -{
> - u32 val;
> -
> - if (can_do_masked_user_access())
> - from = masked_user_access_begin(from);
> - else if (!user_read_access_begin(from, sizeof(*from)))
> - return -EFAULT;
> - unsafe_get_user(val, from, Efault);
> - user_read_access_end();
> - *dest = val;
> - return 0;
> -Efault:
> - user_read_access_end();
> - return -EFAULT;
> -}
> -
> -static __always_inline int futex_put_value(u32 val, u32 __user *to)
> -{
> - if (can_do_masked_user_access())
> - to = masked_user_access_begin(to);
> - else if (!user_write_access_begin(to, sizeof(*to)))
> - return -EFAULT;
> - unsafe_put_user(val, to, Efault);
> - user_write_access_end();
> - return 0;
> -Efault:
> - user_write_access_end();
> - return -EFAULT;
> -}
> -
> +/* Read from user memory with pagefaults disabled */
> static inline int futex_get_value_locked(u32 *dest, u32 __user *from)
> {
> - int ret;
> -
> - pagefault_disable();
> - ret = futex_get_value(dest, from);
> - pagefault_enable();
> -
> - return ret;
> + guard(pagefault)();
> + return get_user_inline(*dest, from);
> }
>
> extern void __futex_unqueue(struct futex_q *q);
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list