[PATCH v6 12/16] PCI/AER: Make all pci_print_aer() log levels depend on error type
Ilpo Järvinen
ilpo.jarvinen at linux.intel.com
Tue May 20 21:37:33 AEST 2025
On Mon, 19 May 2025, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> From: Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stolarek at oracle.com>
>
> Some existing logs in pci_print_aer() log with error severity by default.
> Convert them to depend on error type (consistent with rest of AER logging).
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250321015806.954866-3-pandoh@google.com
> Signed-off-by: Karolina Stolarek <karolina.stolarek at oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index 73b03a195b14..06a7dda20846 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -788,15 +788,21 @@ void pci_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int aer_severity,
> layer = AER_GET_LAYER_ERROR(aer_severity, status);
> agent = AER_GET_AGENT(aer_severity, status);
>
> - pci_err(dev, "aer_status: 0x%08x, aer_mask: 0x%08x\n", status, mask);
> + aer_printk(info.level, dev, "aer_status: 0x%08x, aer_mask: 0x%08x\n",
> + status, mask);
> __aer_print_error(dev, &info);
> - pci_err(dev, "aer_layer=%s, aer_agent=%s\n",
> - aer_error_layer[layer], aer_agent_string[agent]);
> + aer_printk(info.level, dev, "aer_layer=%s, aer_agent=%s\n",
> + aer_error_layer[layer], aer_agent_string[agent]);
>
> if (aer_severity != AER_CORRECTABLE)
> - pci_err(dev, "aer_uncor_severity: 0x%08x\n",
> - aer->uncor_severity);
> + aer_printk(info.level, dev, "aer_uncor_severity: 0x%08x\n",
> + aer->uncor_severity);
>
> + /*
> + * pcie_print_tlp_log() uses KERN_ERR, but we only call it when
> + * tlp_header_valid is set, and info.level is always KERN_ERR in
> + * that case.
> + */
> if (tlp_header_valid)
> pcie_print_tlp_log(dev, &aer->header_log, dev_fmt(" "));
There's another similar callsite but only this has the comment added. I
was thinking if this call could be made from __aer_print_error(). There
would be small change in order of messages but I can't seem to decide if
it would be bad/good.
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen at linux.intel.com>
> }
>
--
i.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list