[PATCH 1/3] powerpc/pseries: Correct secvar format representation for static key management
Andrew Donnellan
ajd at linux.ibm.com
Mon May 5 18:36:48 AEST 2025
On Wed, 2025-04-30 at 14:33 +0530, Srish Srinivasan wrote:
> On a PLPKS enabled PowerVM LPAR, the secvar format property for
> static
> key management is misrepresented as "ibm,plpks-sb-unknown", creating
> reason for confusion.
>
> Static key management mode uses fixed, built-in keys. Dynamic key
> management mode allows keys to be updated in production to handle
> security updates without firmware rebuilds.
>
> Define a function named plpks_get_sb_keymgmt_mode() to retrieve the
> key management mode based on the existence of the SB_VERSION property
> in the firmware.
>
> Set the secvar format property to either "ibm,plpks-sb-v1" or
> "ibm,plpks-sb-v0" based on the key management mode, and return the
> length of the secvar format property.
>
> Co-developed-by: Souradeep <soura at imap.linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Souradeep <soura at imap.linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srish Srinivasan <ssrish at linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar at linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb at linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c | 70 +++++++++++------
> --
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c
> index 257fd1f8bc19..d57067a733ab 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/plpks-secvar.c
> @@ -152,39 +152,49 @@ static int plpks_set_variable(const char *key,
> u64 key_len, u8 *data,
> return rc;
> }
>
> -// PLPKS dynamic secure boot doesn't give us a format string in the
> same way OPAL does.
> -// Instead, report the format using the SB_VERSION variable in the
> keystore.
> -// The string is made up by us, and takes the form "ibm,plpks-sb-
> v<n>" (or "ibm,plpks-sb-unknown"
> -// if the SB_VERSION variable doesn't exist). Hypervisor defines the
> SB_VERSION variable as a
> -// "1 byte unsigned integer value".
> -static ssize_t plpks_secvar_format(char *buf, size_t bufsize)
> +/*
> + * Return the key management mode.
> + *
> + * SB_VERSION is defined as a "1 byte unsigned integer value". It is
> owned by
> + * the Partition Firmware and its presence indicates that the key
> management
> + * mode is dynamic. Only signed variables have null bytes in their
> names.
> + * SB_VERSION does not.
> + *
> + * Return 1 to indicate that the key management mode is dynamic.
> Otherwise
> + * return 0, indicating that the key management mode is static.
> + */
This description isn't accurate.
For dynamic mode, it doesn't return 1, it returns whatever version is
defined in SB_VERSION, which could be 1, or could at some later point be
a higher version.
Which makes the function name a bit of a misnomer too - it is returning
the version number, just the version number can now be zero.
> +static u8 plpks_get_sb_keymgmt_mode(void)
> {
> - struct plpks_var var = {0};
> - ssize_t ret;
> - u8 version;
> -
> - var.component = NULL;
> - // Only the signed variables have null bytes in their names,
> this one doesn't
> - var.name = "SB_VERSION";
> - var.namelen = strlen(var.name);
> - var.datalen = 1;
> - var.data = &version;
> -
> - // Unlike the other vars, SB_VERSION is owned by firmware
> instead of the OS
> - ret = plpks_read_fw_var(&var);
> - if (ret) {
> - if (ret == -ENOENT) {
> - ret = snprintf(buf, bufsize, "ibm,plpks-sb-
> unknown");
> - } else {
> - pr_err("Error %ld reading SB_VERSION from
> firmware\n", ret);
> - ret = -EIO;
> - }
> - goto err;
> + u8 mode;
> + ssize_t rc;
> + struct plpks_var var = {
> + .component = NULL,
> + .name = "SB_VERSION",
> + .namelen = 10,
> + .datalen = 1,
> + .data = &mode,
> + };
> +
> + rc = plpks_read_fw_var(&var);
> + if (rc) {
> + pr_info("Error %ld reading SB_VERSION from
> firmware\n", rc);
We need to check for -ENOENT, otherwise this message is going to be
printed every time you boot a machine in static mode.
I think you should handle this as the existing code does: if it's
ENOENT, return 0, and for other codes print an error and return -EIO.
> + mode = 0;
> }
> + return mode;
> +}
>
> - ret = snprintf(buf, bufsize, "ibm,plpks-sb-v%hhu", version);
> -err:
> - return ret;
> +// PLPKS dynamic secure boot doesn't give us a format string in the
> same way
> +// OPAL does. Instead, report the format using the SB_VERSION
> variable in the
> +// keystore. The string, made up by us, takes the form "ibm,plpks-
> sb-v<n>".Set
> +// the secvar format property to either "ibm,plpks-sb-v1" or
> "ibm,plpks-sb-v0",
> +// based on the key management mode, and return the length of the
> secvar format
> +// property.
> +static ssize_t plpks_secvar_format(char *buf, size_t bufsize)
> +{
> + u8 mode;
> +
> + mode = plpks_get_sb_keymgmt_mode();
> + return snprintf(buf, bufsize, "ibm,plpks-sb-v%hhu", mode);
It might be better to use something like "ibm,plpks-sb-static" in place
of "ibm,plpks-sb-v0" to make it instantly clear that static mode
doesn't use the same version numbering scheme as dynamic mode.
> }
>
> static int plpks_max_size(u64 *max_size)
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
ajd at linux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list