[PATCH v4 00/14] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

[Maxime Ripard]

On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 11:38:23AM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:17:49AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 11:43:15AM +0000, Alessandro Carminati wrote:
> > > > Some unit tests intentionally trigger warning backtraces by passing bad
> > > > parameters to kernel API functions. Such unit tests typically check the
> > > > return value from such calls, not the existence of the warning backtrace.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for picking this series back up! I honestly thought this had
> > > already landed. :)
> > > 
> > > > With CONFIG_KUNIT enabled, image size increase with this series applied is
> > > > approximately 1%. The image size increase (and with it the functionality
> > > > introduced by this series) can be avoided by disabling
> > > > CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE.
> > > 
> > > Yeah, as with my prior review, I'm a fan of this. It makes a bunch of my
> > > very noisy tests much easier to deal with.
> > 
> > And for the record, we're also affected by this in DRM and would very
> > much like to get it merged in one shape or another.
> 
> Here is another case:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250328.Ahc0thi6CaiJ@digikod.net/
> 
> It would be very useful to have this feature merged.  Without it, we may
> need to remove useful tests.

AFAIK, it's been merged in next a couple of weeks ago, so it should be
in 6.15.

Maxime
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20250328/ce2bb210/attachment.sig>