[PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: fsl: fsl,rcpm: Add #power-domain-cells

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzk at kernel.org
Thu Jul 31 16:32:57 AEST 2025


On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 07:58:04AM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> dtbs_check for ls1021.dtsi warns about unsupported property:
>  power-controller at 1ee2140 (fsl,ls1021a-rcpm): '#power-domain-cells' does not match any of the regexes: '^pinctrl-[0-9]+$'
> 
> But if removed the check warns about missing property:
>  power-controller at 1ee2140 (fsl,ls1021a-rcpm): '#power-domain-cells' is a required property


And if any other warning says something, are you going to do that as
well?

> 
> Given commit 8bcf67b8d893b ("ARM: dts: ls1021a: add #power-domain-cells
> for power-controller node") explicitly added that property, add it
> to the expected property list as well.

No, commit does not explain why! It's one of this NXP commits without
explanation, doing random things.

No, explain why do you think this is a power domain provider - fast
look told me that it is NOT.

Best regards,
Krzysztof



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list