[PATCH v2 00/12] YAML conversion of several Freescale/PowerPC DT bindings
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Tue Feb 11 03:19:56 AEDT 2025
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 03:57:42PM +0000, J. Neuschäfer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:59:35PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Please don't do this, it just makes it harder to merge things since it
> > makes it look like there's cross tree merges needed when that's not the
> > case, complicating merging, and puts the entire series in everyone's
> > inbox which makes things more noisy.
> How should I proceed with this series, in your opinion?
> I see potential advantages (less of the issues you describe) and
> disadvantages (somewhat harder to track patches) of splitting it up
> before sending v3.
I'd rather that at least the SPI stuff were sent separately (well,
ideally what you've done already is fine and it doesn't need a resend at
all).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20250210/4412b4d5/attachment.sig>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list