[PATCH v2 04/18] cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: Use __free(put_cpufreq_policy) for policy reference

Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar at linaro.org
Fri Aug 29 16:26:24 AEST 2025


On 29-08-25, 14:16, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
> Thanks for applying the patch!
> 
> I’ve been thinking further — instead of using __free directly, maybe we
> could introduce a small macro wrapper around it to make the release scope
> more controllable and consistent.
> 
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/6174bcc8-30f5-479b-bac6-f42eb1232b4d@kylinos.cn/
> 
> Do you think this would be a better approach, or should we just stick with
> the current use of __free?

Lets keep it simple for now and use __free directly. And keep this
similar with other parts of the kernel.

-- 
viresh


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list