[PATCH v2 04/18] cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: Use __free(put_cpufreq_policy) for policy reference
Viresh Kumar
viresh.kumar at linaro.org
Fri Aug 29 16:26:24 AEST 2025
On 29-08-25, 14:16, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
> Thanks for applying the patch!
>
> I’ve been thinking further — instead of using __free directly, maybe we
> could introduce a small macro wrapper around it to make the release scope
> more controllable and consistent.
>
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/6174bcc8-30f5-479b-bac6-f42eb1232b4d@kylinos.cn/
>
> Do you think this would be a better approach, or should we just stick with
> the current use of __free?
Lets keep it simple for now and use __free directly. And keep this
similar with other parts of the kernel.
--
viresh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list