[PATCH] perf build: Add tools/arch/x86/include/asm/amd/ibs.h to sync the headers

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 01:54:44PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 10:39:56PM +0530, Venkat Rao Bagalkote wrote:
> > > On 24/04/25 10:00 pm, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> > > Tested this patch by applying on tip HEAD:
> > > 7ab869c799fc0fb22f9b4c2f36aaa603d9c7cc9d and it fixes the reported issue.

> > This is just a long list of characters, can you please next time provide
> > something like, humm, tip/head, not really:
> 
> > ⬢ [acme at toolbx perf-tools-next]$ git remote -v | grep tip
> > tip	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git (fetch)
> > tip	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git (push)
> > ⬢ [acme at toolbx perf-tools-next]$ git remote update tip 
> > Fetching tip
> > ⬢ [acme at toolbx perf-tools-next]$ git show 7ab869c799fc0fb22f9b4c2f36aaa603d9c7cc9d
> > fatal: bad object 7ab869c799fc0fb22f9b4c2f36aaa603d9c7cc9d
> > ⬢ [acme at toolbx perf-tools-next]$

> > So please add the summary, that way we can try to figure out if this is
> > a rebase and they look for the description instead of this sha1 that I'm
> > not finding even after doing a 'git remore update tip'.

> Does this mean the kernel change broke the tool build but we don't have
> it in the perf-tools-next yet?  Then probably we need to wait for the
> next merge window to fix it in the tool side, no?

I'm not noticing this with perf-tools-next on a 9950x3d fedora:42 and
the referenced commit is not present in it nor in upstream nor in tip
master, so I need the reporter to check his environment and report back.

- Arnaldo