linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

[LEROY Christophe]

Le 13/09/2024 à 17:49, Jakub Kicinski a écrit :
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:34:26 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> The second "asm" above (CONFIG_PPC_KERNEL_PREFIXED is not set).  I am
>>> guessing by searching for "39" in net/core/page_pool.s
>>>
>>> This is maybe called from page_pool_unref_netmem()
>>
>> Thanks! The compiler version helped, I can repro with GCC 14.
>>
>> It's something special about compound page handling on powerpc64,
>> AFAICT. I'm guessing that the assembler is mad that we're doing
>> an unaligned read:
>>
>>     3300         ld 8,39(8)       # MEM[(const struct atomic64_t *)_29].counter, t
>>
>> which does indeed look unaligned to a naked eye. If I replace
>> virt_to_head_page() with virt_to_page() on line 867 in net/core/page_pool.c
>> I get:
>>
>>     2982         ld 8,40(10)      # MEM[(const struct atomic64_t *)_94].counter, t
>>
>> and that's what we'd expect. It's reading pp_ref_count which is at
>> offset 40 in struct net_iov. I'll try to take a closer look at
>> the compound page handling, with powerpc assembly book in hand,
>> but perhaps this rings a bell for someone?
> 
> Oh, okay, I think I understand now. My lack of MM knowledge showing.
> So if it's a compound head we do:
> 
> static inline unsigned long _compound_head(const struct page *page)
> {
>          unsigned long head = READ_ONCE(page->compound_head);
>                                                                                  
>          if (unlikely(head & 1))
>                  return head - 1;
>          return (unsigned long)page_fixed_fake_head(page);
> }
> 
> Presumably page->compound_head stores the pointer to the head page.
> I'm guessing the compiler is "smart" and decides "why should I do
> ld (page - 1) + 40, when I can do ld page + 39 :|
> 
> I think it's a compiler bug...
> 

Would it work if you replace it with following ?

	return head & ~1;

Christophe