[PATCH net-next v2 3/7] net: ethernet: fs_enet: drop the .adjust_link custom fs_ops
Maxime Chevallier
maxime.chevallier at bootlin.com
Wed Sep 4 18:27:11 AEST 2024
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 23:06:08 +0200
Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch> wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c
> > @@ -649,12 +649,7 @@ static void fs_adjust_link(struct net_device *dev)
> > unsigned long flags;
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&fep->lock, flags);
> > -
> > - if (fep->ops->adjust_link)
> > - fep->ops->adjust_link(dev);
> > - else
> > - generic_adjust_link(dev);
> > -
> > + generic_adjust_link(dev);
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fep->lock, flags);
>
> Holding a spinlock is pretty unusual. We are in thread context, and
> the phydev mutex is held. Looking at generic_adjust_link, do any of
> the fep->foo variables actually need protecting, particularly from
> changes in interrupts context?
Yes there are, the interrupt mask/event registers are being accessed
from the interrupt handler and the ->restart() hook. I can try to
rework this a bit for a cleaner interrupt handling, but I don't have
means to test this on all mac flavors (fec/fcc/scc) :(
Thanks for reviewing this,
Maxime
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list