[RFC v2 0/4] cma: powerpc fadump fixes

[David Hildenbrand]

On 11.10.24 12:17, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list at gmail.com> writes:
>> Please find the v2 of cma related powerpc fadump fixes.
>>
>> Patch-1 is a change in mm/cma.c to make sure we return an error if someone uses
>> cma_init_reserved_mem() before the pageblock_order is initalized.
>>
>> I guess, it's best if Patch-1 goes via mm tree and since rest of the changes
>> are powerpc fadump fixes hence those should go via powerpc tree. Right?
> 
> Yes I think that will work.
> 
> Because there's no actual dependency on patch 1, correct?
> 
> Let's see if the mm folks are happy with the approach, and if so you
> should send patch 1 on its own, and patches 2-4 as a separate series.

Makes sense to me.

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb