[PATCH 2/3] powerpc: Adjust adding stack protector flags to KBUILD_CLAGS for clang
Christophe Leroy
christophe.leroy at csgroup.eu
Tue Oct 8 16:10:36 AEDT 2024
Le 08/10/2024 à 06:22, Nathan Chancellor a écrit :
> After fixing the HAVE_STACKPROTECTER checks for clang's in-progress
> per-task stack protector support [1], the build fails during prepare0
> because '-mstack-protector-guard-offset' has not been added to
> KBUILD_CFLAGS yet but the other '-mstack-protector-guard' flags have.
>
> clang: error: '-mstack-protector-guard=tls' is used without '-mstack-protector-guard-offset', and there is no default
> clang: error: '-mstack-protector-guard=tls' is used without '-mstack-protector-guard-offset', and there is no default
> make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:229: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
> make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:102: scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.s] Error 1
>
> Mirror other architectures and add all '-mstack-protector-guard' flags
> to KBUILD_CFLAGS atomically during stack_protector_prepare, which
> resolves the issue and allows clang's implementation to fully work with
> the kernel.
>
> Link: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fllvm%2Fllvm-project%2Fpull%2F110928&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7Cc099707fa5464808c49108dce750d65e%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638639581583232977%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=b%2BcqodA6k739DD%2F74EJMXUtIHAZDt1DGcyd7mzzhbd8%3D&reserved=0 [1]
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan at kernel.org>
Is it worth a Fixes: tag so that it gets applied on stable, or wont
CLANG 20 be used with kernels older than 6.13 ?
> ---
> arch/powerpc/Makefile | 15 ++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> index bbfe4a1f06ef9db9b2f2e48e02096b1e0500a14b..8f9e387c4c7dd06d8756dca3eac808cc344a937d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
> @@ -100,13 +100,6 @@ KBUILD_AFLAGS += -m$(BITS)
> KBUILD_LDFLAGS += -m elf$(BITS)$(LDEMULATION)
> endif
>
> -cflags-$(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) += -mstack-protector-guard=tls
> -ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> -cflags-$(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) += -mstack-protector-guard-reg=r13
> -else
> -cflags-$(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR) += -mstack-protector-guard-reg=r2
> -endif
> -
> LDFLAGS_vmlinux-y := -Bstatic
> LDFLAGS_vmlinux-$(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE) := -pie
> LDFLAGS_vmlinux-$(CONFIG_RELOCATABLE) += -z notext
> @@ -402,9 +395,13 @@ prepare: stack_protector_prepare
> PHONY += stack_protector_prepare
> stack_protector_prepare: prepare0
> ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> - $(eval KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mstack-protector-guard-offset=$(shell awk '{if ($$2 == "PACA_CANARY") print $$3;}' include/generated/asm-offsets.h))
> + $(eval KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mstack-protector-guard=tls \
> + -mstack-protector-guard-reg=r13 \
Can you put both above lines on a single line to avoid having too many
lines at the end:
+ $(eval KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mstack-protector-guard=tls
-mstack-protector-guard-reg=r13 \
> + -mstack-protector-guard-offset=$(shell awk '{if ($$2 == "PACA_CANARY") print $$3;}' include/generated/asm-offsets.h))
> else
> - $(eval KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mstack-protector-guard-offset=$(shell awk '{if ($$2 == "TASK_CANARY") print $$3;}' include/generated/asm-offsets.h))
> + $(eval KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mstack-protector-guard=tls \
> + -mstack-protector-guard-reg=r2 \
Same
> + -mstack-protector-guard-offset=$(shell awk '{if ($$2 == "TASK_CANARY") print $$3;}' include/generated/asm-offsets.h))
> endif
> endif
>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list