[PATCH net-next] net: use pdev instead of OF funcs
Rosen Penev
rosenp at gmail.com
Tue Nov 12 05:15:09 AEDT 2024
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 8:21 AM Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 5:40 PM Rosen Penev <rosenp at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > np here is ofdev->dev.of_node. Better to use the proper functions as
> > there's no use of children or anything else.
>
> Your commit message needs some work.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/can/grcan.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/net/ethernet/allwinner/sun4i-emac.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_mpc52xx.c | 23 ++++++++++---------
> > .../net/ethernet/freescale/fec_mpc52xx_phy.c | 12 ++++++----
> > .../net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-fcc.c | 2 +-
> > .../net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-fec.c | 2 +-
> > .../net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-scc.c | 2 +-
> > .../net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mii-fec.c | 12 ++++++----
> > drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/ucc_geth.c | 12 +++++-----
> > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/moxa/moxart_ether.c | 4 ++--
> > .../ethernet/samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_platform.c | 8 +++----
> > drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-rhine.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-velocity.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx/ll_temac_mdio.c | 6 ++---
> > drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mux-mmioreg.c | 16 +++++++------
> > drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c | 10 ++++----
> > 19 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/grcan.c b/drivers/net/can/grcan.c
> > index cdf0ec9fa7f3..0a2cc0ba219f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/grcan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/grcan.c
> > @@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@ static int grcan_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> > goto exit_error;
> > }
> >
> > - irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, GRCAN_IRQIX_IRQ);
> > + irq = platform_get_irq(ofdev, GRCAN_IRQIX_IRQ);
> > if (!irq) {
> > dev_err(&ofdev->dev, "no irq found\n");
> > err = -ENODEV;
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
> > index 0080c39ee182..252ad40bdb97 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mpc5xxx_can.c
> > @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int mpc5xxx_can_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> > if (!base)
> > return dev_err_probe(&ofdev->dev, err, "couldn't ioremap\n");
> >
> > - irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
> > + irq = platform_get_irq(ofdev, 0);
> > if (!irq) {
> > dev_err(&ofdev->dev, "no irq found\n");
> > err = -ENODEV;
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
> > index 43bde1f583ff..9229582efd05 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
> > @@ -1443,8 +1443,8 @@ static int bcm_sf2_sw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > of_node_put(ports);
> > }
> >
> > - priv->irq0 = irq_of_parse_and_map(dn, 0);
> > - priv->irq1 = irq_of_parse_and_map(dn, 1);
> > + priv->irq0 = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + priv->irq1 = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> >
> > base = &priv->core;
> > for (i = 0; i < BCM_SF2_REGS_NUM; i++) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/allwinner/sun4i-emac.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/allwinner/sun4i-emac.c
> > index 2f516b950f4e..18df8d1d93fd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/allwinner/sun4i-emac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/allwinner/sun4i-emac.c
> > @@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ static int emac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > /* fill in parameters for net-dev structure */
> > ndev->base_addr = (unsigned long)db->membase;
> > - ndev->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
> > + ndev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > if (ndev->irq == -ENXIO) {
> > netdev_err(ndev, "No irq resource\n");
> > ret = ndev->irq;
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_mpc52xx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_mpc52xx.c
> > index 2bfaf14f65c8..553d33a98c99 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_mpc52xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_mpc52xx.c
> > @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ static int mpc52xx_fec_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> > int rv;
> > struct net_device *ndev;
> > struct mpc52xx_fec_priv *priv = NULL;
> > - struct resource mem;
> > + struct resource *mem;
> > const u32 *prop;
> > int prop_size;
> > struct device_node *np = op->dev.of_node;
> > @@ -828,20 +828,21 @@ static int mpc52xx_fec_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> > priv->ndev = ndev;
> >
> > /* Reserve FEC control zone */
> > - rv = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &mem);
> > - if (rv) {
> > + mem = platform_get_resource(op, 0, IORESOURCE_MEM);
> > + if (!mem) {
> > pr_err("Error while parsing device node resource\n");
> > + rv = -ENODEV;
> > goto err_netdev;
> > }
> > - if (resource_size(&mem) < sizeof(struct mpc52xx_fec)) {
> > + if (resource_size(mem) < sizeof(struct mpc52xx_fec)) {
> > pr_err("invalid resource size (%lx < %x), check mpc52xx_devices.c\n",
> > - (unsigned long)resource_size(&mem),
> > + (unsigned long)resource_size(mem),
> > sizeof(struct mpc52xx_fec));
> > rv = -EINVAL;
> > goto err_netdev;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!request_mem_region(mem.start, sizeof(struct mpc52xx_fec),
> > + if (!request_mem_region(mem->start, sizeof(struct mpc52xx_fec),
> > DRIVER_NAME)) {
> > rv = -EBUSY;
> > goto err_netdev;
> > @@ -851,13 +852,13 @@ static int mpc52xx_fec_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> > ndev->netdev_ops = &mpc52xx_fec_netdev_ops;
> > ndev->ethtool_ops = &mpc52xx_fec_ethtool_ops;
> > ndev->watchdog_timeo = FEC_WATCHDOG_TIMEOUT;
> > - ndev->base_addr = mem.start;
> > + ndev->base_addr = mem->start;
> > SET_NETDEV_DEV(ndev, &op->dev);
> >
> > spin_lock_init(&priv->lock);
> >
> > /* ioremap the zones */
> > - priv->fec = ioremap(mem.start, sizeof(struct mpc52xx_fec));
> > + priv->fec = ioremap(mem->start, sizeof(struct mpc52xx_fec));
>
> Generally, devm_platform_ioremap_resource(),
> devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(), etc. are preferred. So if
> we're going to rework things, rework them to use those.
I'm going to avoid that as I've been constantly getting requests to
test my changes on real hardware. I don't own anything that uses
fec_mpc52xx.c.
Plus, documentation states that netdev isn't too big of a fan of devm.
Oh and this file uses no devm of any kind.
>
> Rob
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list