[PATCH v4 5/7] KVM: x86: Relax locking for kvm_test_age_gfn and kvm_age_gfn
James Houghton
jthoughton at google.com
Thu May 30 04:05:08 AEST 2024
Walk the TDP MMU in an RCU read-side critical section. This requires a
way to do RCU-safe walking of the tdp_mmu_roots; do this with a new
macro. The PTE modifications are now done atomically, and
kvm_tdp_mmu_spte_need_atomic_write() has been updated to account for the
fact that kvm_age_gfn can now lockless update the accessed bit and the
R/X bits).
If the cmpxchg for marking the spte for access tracking fails, we simply
retry if the spte is still a leaf PTE. If it isn't, we return false
to continue the walk.
Harvesting age information from the shadow MMU is still done while
holding the MMU write lock.
Suggested-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao at google.com>
Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton at google.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 18 ++++-----
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h | 27 +++++++------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index ece45b3f6f20..48fb29bb782f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1438,6 +1438,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
* tdp_mmu_page set.
*
* For reads, this list is protected by:
+ * RCU alone or
* the MMU lock in read mode + RCU or
* the MMU lock in write mode
*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 6a2a557c2c31..956834da8a0e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1630,16 +1630,15 @@ bool kvm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
{
bool young = false;
- write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-
- if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
+ if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm)) {
+ write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
young = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_age_rmap);
+ write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ }
if (tdp_mmu_enabled)
young |= kvm_tdp_mmu_age_gfn_range(kvm, range);
- write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-
return young;
}
@@ -1647,16 +1646,15 @@ bool kvm_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
{
bool young = false;
- write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-
- if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm))
+ if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm)) {
+ write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
young = kvm_handle_gfn_range(kvm, range, kvm_test_age_rmap);
+ write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ }
if (tdp_mmu_enabled)
young |= kvm_tdp_mmu_test_age_gfn(kvm, range);
- write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-
return young;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
index fae559559a80..f558ae9054af 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h
@@ -24,16 +24,24 @@ static inline u64 kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte_atomic(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 new_spte)
return xchg(rcu_dereference(sptep), new_spte);
}
+static inline u64 tdp_mmu_clear_spte_bits_atomic(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 mask)
+{
+ atomic64_t *sptep_atomic = (atomic64_t *)rcu_dereference(sptep);
+
+ return (u64)atomic64_fetch_and(~mask, sptep_atomic);
+}
+
static inline void __kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 new_spte)
{
WRITE_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(sptep), new_spte);
}
/*
- * SPTEs must be modified atomically if they are shadow-present, leaf
- * SPTEs, and have volatile bits, i.e. has bits that can be set outside
- * of mmu_lock. The Writable bit can be set by KVM's fast page fault
- * handler, and Accessed and Dirty bits can be set by the CPU.
+ * SPTEs must be modified atomically if they have bits that can be set outside
+ * of the mmu_lock. This can happen for any shadow-present leaf SPTEs, as the
+ * Writable bit can be set by KVM's fast page fault handler, the Accessed and
+ * Dirty bits can be set by the CPU, and the Accessed and R/X bits can be
+ * cleared by age_gfn_range.
*
* Note, non-leaf SPTEs do have Accessed bits and those bits are
* technically volatile, but KVM doesn't consume the Accessed bit of
@@ -44,8 +52,7 @@ static inline void __kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 new_spte)
static inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_spte_need_atomic_write(u64 old_spte, int level)
{
return is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte) &&
- is_last_spte(old_spte, level) &&
- spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte);
+ is_last_spte(old_spte, level);
}
static inline u64 kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 old_spte,
@@ -61,12 +68,8 @@ static inline u64 kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 old_spte,
static inline u64 tdp_mmu_clear_spte_bits(tdp_ptep_t sptep, u64 old_spte,
u64 mask, int level)
{
- atomic64_t *sptep_atomic;
-
- if (kvm_tdp_mmu_spte_need_atomic_write(old_spte, level)) {
- sptep_atomic = (atomic64_t *)rcu_dereference(sptep);
- return (u64)atomic64_fetch_and(~mask, sptep_atomic);
- }
+ if (kvm_tdp_mmu_spte_need_atomic_write(old_spte, level))
+ return tdp_mmu_clear_spte_bits_atomic(sptep, mask);
__kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(sptep, old_spte & ~mask);
return old_spte;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 1259dd63defc..c74b0221dae0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -29,6 +29,11 @@ static __always_inline bool kvm_lockdep_assert_mmu_lock_held(struct kvm *kvm,
return true;
}
+static __always_inline bool kvm_lockdep_assert_rcu_read_lock_held(void)
+{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
+ return true;
+}
void kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
{
@@ -178,6 +183,15 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *tdp_mmu_next_root(struct kvm *kvm,
((_only_valid) && (_root)->role.invalid))) { \
} else
+/*
+ * Iterate over all TDP MMU roots in an RCU read-side critical section.
+ */
+#define for_each_tdp_mmu_root_rcu(_kvm, _root, _as_id) \
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(_root, &_kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots, link) \
+ if (kvm_lockdep_assert_rcu_read_lock_held() && \
+ (_as_id >= 0 && kvm_mmu_page_as_id(_root) != _as_id)) { \
+ } else
+
#define for_each_tdp_mmu_root(_kvm, _root, _as_id) \
__for_each_tdp_mmu_root(_kvm, _root, _as_id, false)
@@ -1223,6 +1237,27 @@ static __always_inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
return ret;
}
+static __always_inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_gfn_lockless(
+ struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_gfn_range *range,
+ tdp_handler_t handler)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
+ struct tdp_iter iter;
+ bool ret = false;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ for_each_tdp_mmu_root_rcu(kvm, root, range->slot->as_id) {
+ tdp_root_for_each_leaf_pte(iter, root, range->start, range->end)
+ ret |= handler(kvm, &iter, range);
+ }
+
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/*
* Mark the SPTEs range of GFNs [start, end) unaccessed and return non-zero
* if any of the GFNs in the range have been accessed.
@@ -1236,28 +1271,30 @@ static bool age_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
{
u64 new_spte;
+retry:
/* If we have a non-accessed entry we don't need to change the pte. */
if (!is_accessed_spte(iter->old_spte))
return false;
if (spte_ad_enabled(iter->old_spte)) {
- iter->old_spte = tdp_mmu_clear_spte_bits(iter->sptep,
- iter->old_spte,
- shadow_accessed_mask,
- iter->level);
+ iter->old_spte = tdp_mmu_clear_spte_bits_atomic(iter->sptep,
+ shadow_accessed_mask);
new_spte = iter->old_spte & ~shadow_accessed_mask;
} else {
- /*
- * Capture the dirty status of the page, so that it doesn't get
- * lost when the SPTE is marked for access tracking.
- */
+ new_spte = mark_spte_for_access_track(iter->old_spte);
+ if (__tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(iter, new_spte)) {
+ /*
+ * The cmpxchg failed. If the spte is still a
+ * last-level spte, we can safely retry.
+ */
+ if (is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte) &&
+ is_last_spte(iter->old_spte, iter->level))
+ goto retry;
+ /* Otherwise, continue walking. */
+ return false;
+ }
if (is_writable_pte(iter->old_spte))
kvm_set_pfn_dirty(spte_to_pfn(iter->old_spte));
-
- new_spte = mark_spte_for_access_track(iter->old_spte);
- iter->old_spte = kvm_tdp_mmu_write_spte(iter->sptep,
- iter->old_spte, new_spte,
- iter->level);
}
trace_kvm_tdp_mmu_spte_changed(iter->as_id, iter->gfn, iter->level,
@@ -1267,7 +1304,7 @@ static bool age_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
bool kvm_tdp_mmu_age_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
{
- return kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_gfn(kvm, range, age_gfn_range);
+ return kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_gfn_lockless(kvm, range, age_gfn_range);
}
static bool test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
@@ -1278,7 +1315,7 @@ static bool test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
bool kvm_tdp_mmu_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
{
- return kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_gfn(kvm, range, test_age_gfn);
+ return kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_gfn_lockless(kvm, range, test_age_gfn);
}
/*
--
2.45.1.288.g0e0cd299f1-goog
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list