[PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/configs: Update defconfig with now user-visible CONFIG_FSL_IFC

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 28/05/2024 15:33, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> writes:
> 
>> On 28/05/2024 14:28, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>>> With CONFIG_FSL_IFC now being user-visible, and thus changed from a select
>>> to depends in CONFIG_MTD_NAND_FSL_IFC, the dependencies needs to be
>>> selected in config snippets.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben at geanix.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/powerpc/configs/85xx-hw.config | 2 ++
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/85xx-hw.config b/arch/powerpc/configs/85xx-hw.config
>>> index 524db76f47b7..8aff83217397 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/configs/85xx-hw.config
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/85xx-hw.config
>>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ CONFIG_FS_ENET=y
>>>  CONFIG_FSL_CORENET_CF=y
>>>  CONFIG_FSL_DMA=y
>>>  CONFIG_FSL_HV_MANAGER=y
>>> +CONFIG_FSL_IFC=y
>>
>> Does not look like placed according to config order.
> 
> Correct.
> 
>> This is not alphabetically sorted, but as Kconfig creates it (make
>> savedefconfig).
> 
> Are you sure about this?
> 
> It looks very much alphabetically sorted, with only two "errors"

Uh, ok, in general this is savedefconfig-sorted, but of course some
platforms can choose other way. At least all arm and arm64 are
savedefconfig-sorted.

Follow whatever is there already, so in this case alphabetical.

...

> 
>>>  CONFIG_FSL_PQ_MDIO=y
>>>  CONFIG_FSL_RIO=y
>>
>> You also missed to update second defconfig - arm64.
> 
> Argh. I thought I checked, and it did not need any changes. But it needs
> to have CONFIG_FSL_IFC=y added.
> 
> I will add that for v3.
> 
> /Esben

Best regards,
Krzysztof