[PATCH 2/3] crypto: X25519 core functions for ppc64le
Danny Tsen
dtsen at linux.ibm.com
Wed May 15 23:06:01 AEST 2024
Hi Andy,
Points taken. And much appreciate for the help.
Thanks.
-Danny
On 5/15/24 3:29 AM, Andy Polyakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> +static void cswap(fe51 p, fe51 q, unsigned int bit)
>> +{
>> + u64 t, i;
>> + u64 c = 0 - (u64) bit;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < 5; ++i) {
>> + t = c & (p[i] ^ q[i]);
>> + p[i] ^= t;
>> + q[i] ^= t;
>> + }
>> +}
>
> The "c" in cswap stands for "constant-time," and the problem is that
> contemporary compilers have exhibited the ability to produce
> non-constant-time machine code as result of compilation of the above
> kind of technique. The outcome is platform-specific and ironically
> some of PPC code generators were observed to generate "most"
> non-constant-time code. "Most" in sense that execution time variations
> would be most easy to catch. One way to work around the problem, at
> least for the time being, is to add 'asm volatile("" : "+r"(c))' after
> you calculate 'c'. But there is no guarantee that the next compiler
> version won't see through it, hence the permanent solution is to do it
> in assembly. I can put together something...
>
> Cheers.
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list