[kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 03/31] powerpc: Mark known failing tests as kfail

[Nicholas Piggin]

On Mon May 6, 2024 at 5:37 PM AEST, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 04/05/2024 14.28, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > Mark the failing h_cede_tm and spapr_vpa tests as kfail.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   powerpc/spapr_vpa.c | 3 ++-
> >   powerpc/tm.c        | 3 ++-
> >   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/powerpc/spapr_vpa.c b/powerpc/spapr_vpa.c
> > index c2075e157..46fa0485c 100644
> > --- a/powerpc/spapr_vpa.c
> > +++ b/powerpc/spapr_vpa.c
> > @@ -150,7 +150,8 @@ static void test_vpa(void)
> >   		report_fail("Could not deregister after registration");
> >   
> >   	disp_count1 = be32_to_cpu(vpa->vp_dispatch_count);
> > -	report(disp_count1 % 2 == 1, "Dispatch count is odd after deregister");
> > +	/* TCG known fail, could be wrong test, must verify against PowerVM */
> > +	report_kfail(true, disp_count1 % 2 == 1, "Dispatch count is odd after deregister");
>
> Using "true" as first argument looks rather pointless - then you could also 
> simply delete the test completely if it can never be tested reliably.
>
> Thus could you please introduce a helper function is_tcg() that could be 
> used to check whether we run under TCG (and not KVM)? I think you could 
> check for "linux,kvm" in the "compatible" property in /hypervisor in the 
> device tree to see whether we're running in KVM mode or in TCG mode.

This I added in patch 30.

The reason for the suboptimal patch ordering was just me being lazy and
avoiding rebasing annoyance. I'd written a bunch of failing test cases
for QEMU work, but hadn't done the kvm/tcg test yet. It had a few
conflicts so I put it at the end... can rebase if you'd really prefer.

>
> >   	report_prefix_pop();
> >   }
> > diff --git a/powerpc/tm.c b/powerpc/tm.c
> > index 6b1ceeb6e..d9e7f455d 100644
> > --- a/powerpc/tm.c
> > +++ b/powerpc/tm.c
> > @@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >   		report_skip("TM is not available");
> >   		goto done;
> >   	}
> > -	report(cpus_with_tm == nr_cpus,
> > +	/* KVM does not report TM in secondary threads in POWER9 */
> > +	report_kfail(true, cpus_with_tm == nr_cpus,
> >   	       "TM available in all 'ibm,pa-features' properties");
>
> Could you check the PVR for POWER9 here instead of using "true" as first 
> parameter?

Also covered in patch 30.

Thanks,
Nick