[kvm-unit-tests PATCH v9 02/31] report: Add known failure reporting option
Nicholas Piggin
npiggin at gmail.com
Sat May 4 22:28:08 AEST 2024
There are times we would like to test a function that is known to fail
in some conditions due to a bug in implementation (QEMU, KVM, or even
hardware). It would be nice to count these as known failures and not
report a summary failure.
xfail is not the same thing, xfail means failure is required and a pass
causes the test to fail. So add kfail for known failures.
Mark the failing ppc64 h_cede_tm and spapr_vpa tests as kfail.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>
---
lib/libcflat.h | 2 ++
lib/report.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/libcflat.h b/lib/libcflat.h
index 700f43527..ae3c2c6d0 100644
--- a/lib/libcflat.h
+++ b/lib/libcflat.h
@@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ extern void report(bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
__attribute__((format(printf, 2, 3), nonnull(2)));
extern void report_xfail(bool xfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
__attribute__((format(printf, 3, 4), nonnull(3)));
+extern void report_kfail(bool kfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
+ __attribute__((format(printf, 3, 4), nonnull(3)));
extern void report_abort(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
__attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)))
__attribute__((noreturn));
diff --git a/lib/report.c b/lib/report.c
index 8e9bff5b8..7f3c4f059 100644
--- a/lib/report.c
+++ b/lib/report.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
#include "libcflat.h"
#include "asm/spinlock.h"
-static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures, skipped;
+static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures, kfailures, skipped;
static char prefixes[256];
static struct spinlock lock;
@@ -81,11 +81,12 @@ void report_prefix_pop(void)
}
static void va_report(const char *msg_fmt,
- bool pass, bool xfail, bool skip, va_list va)
+ bool pass, bool xfail, bool kfail, bool skip, va_list va)
{
const char *prefix = skip ? "SKIP"
: xfail ? (pass ? "XPASS" : "XFAIL")
- : (pass ? "PASS" : "FAIL");
+ : kfail ? (pass ? "PASS" : "KFAIL")
+ : (pass ? "PASS" : "FAIL");
spin_lock(&lock);
@@ -98,6 +99,8 @@ static void va_report(const char *msg_fmt,
skipped++;
else if (xfail && !pass)
xfailures++;
+ else if (kfail && !pass)
+ kfailures++;
else if (xfail || !pass)
failures++;
@@ -108,7 +111,7 @@ void report(bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
{
va_list va;
va_start(va, msg_fmt);
- va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, false, va);
+ va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, false, false, va);
va_end(va);
}
@@ -117,7 +120,7 @@ void report_pass(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
va_list va;
va_start(va, msg_fmt);
- va_report(msg_fmt, true, false, false, va);
+ va_report(msg_fmt, true, false, false, false, va);
va_end(va);
}
@@ -126,7 +129,7 @@ void report_fail(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
va_list va;
va_start(va, msg_fmt);
- va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, va);
+ va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, false, va);
va_end(va);
}
@@ -134,7 +137,19 @@ void report_xfail(bool xfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
{
va_list va;
va_start(va, msg_fmt);
- va_report(msg_fmt, pass, xfail, false, va);
+ va_report(msg_fmt, pass, xfail, false, false, va);
+ va_end(va);
+}
+
+/*
+ * kfail is known failure. If kfail is true then test will succeed
+ * regardless of pass.
+ */
+void report_kfail(bool kfail, bool pass, const char *msg_fmt, ...)
+{
+ va_list va;
+ va_start(va, msg_fmt);
+ va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, kfail, false, va);
va_end(va);
}
@@ -142,7 +157,7 @@ void report_skip(const char *msg_fmt, ...)
{
va_list va;
va_start(va, msg_fmt);
- va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, true, va);
+ va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, false, true, va);
va_end(va);
}
@@ -168,6 +183,8 @@ int report_summary(void)
printf("SUMMARY: %d tests", tests);
if (failures)
printf(", %d unexpected failures", failures);
+ if (kfailures)
+ printf(", %d known failures", kfailures);
if (xfailures)
printf(", %d expected failures", xfailures);
if (skipped)
--
2.43.0
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list