[PATCH v4 16/29] arm64: add pte_access_permitted_no_overlay()
Joey Gouly
joey.gouly at arm.com
Fri May 3 23:01:34 AEST 2024
We do not want take POE into account when clearing the MTE tags.
Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly at arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 5c970a9cca67..2449e4e27ea6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -160,8 +160,10 @@ static inline pteval_t __phys_to_pte_val(phys_addr_t phys)
* not set) must return false. PROT_NONE mappings do not have the
* PTE_VALID bit set.
*/
-#define pte_access_permitted(pte, write) \
+#define pte_access_permitted_no_overlay(pte, write) \
(((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER)) == (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER)) && (!(write) || pte_write(pte)))
+#define pte_access_permitted(pte, write) \
+ pte_access_permitted_no_overlay(pte, write)
#define pmd_access_permitted(pmd, write) \
(pte_access_permitted(pmd_pte(pmd), (write)))
#define pud_access_permitted(pud, write) \
@@ -348,10 +350,11 @@ static inline void __sync_cache_and_tags(pte_t pte, unsigned int nr_pages)
/*
* If the PTE would provide user space access to the tags associated
* with it then ensure that the MTE tags are synchronised. Although
- * pte_access_permitted() returns false for exec only mappings, they
- * don't expose tags (instruction fetches don't check tags).
+ * pte_access_permitted_no_overlay() returns false for exec only
+ * mappings, they don't expose tags (instruction fetches don't check
+ * tags).
*/
- if (system_supports_mte() && pte_access_permitted(pte, false) &&
+ if (system_supports_mte() && pte_access_permitted_no_overlay(pte, false) &&
!pte_special(pte) && pte_tagged(pte))
mte_sync_tags(pte, nr_pages);
}
--
2.25.1
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list