[PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: Make cxl obsolete
Andrew Donnellan
ajd at linux.ibm.com
Fri May 3 13:15:42 AEST 2024
On Tue, 2024-04-09 at 14:37 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> Something like the patch below. Anyone who has an existing config and
> runs oldconfig will get a prompt, eg:
>
> Deprecated support for IBM Coherent Accelerators (CXL)
> (DEPRECATED_CXL) [N/m/y/?] (NEW)
>
> Folks who just use defconfig etc. won't notice any change which is a
> pity. We could also change the default to n, but that risks breaking
> someone's machine. Maybe we do that in a another releases time.
>
> cheers
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/cxl/Kconfig
> index 5efc4151bf58..e3fd3fcaf62a 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/Kconfig
> @@ -9,11 +9,18 @@ config CXL_BASE
> select PPC_64S_HASH_MMU
>
> config CXL
> - tristate "Support for IBM Coherent Accelerators (CXL)"
> + def_bool y
> + depends on DEPRECATED_CXL
> +
> +config DEPRECATED_CXL
> + tristate "Deprecated support for IBM Coherent Accelerators
> (CXL)"
This doesn't seem quite right to me, I don't think we can just redefine
CONFIG_CXL as a bool, but I'll do something like this. Probably won't
bother for CXLFLASH since they'll see it for CXL anyway, but I might
add a warning message on probe to both drivers.
> depends on PPC_POWERNV && PCI_MSI && EEH
> select CXL_BASE
> default m
> help
> + The cxl driver is no longer actively maintained and we
> intend to
> + remove it in a future kernel release.
> +
> Select this option to enable driver support for IBM
> Coherent
> Accelerators (CXL). CXL is otherwise known as Coherent
> Accelerator
> Processor Interface (CAPI). CAPI allows accelerators in
> FPGAs to be
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
ajd at linux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list