[kvm-unit-tests PATCH 07/32] powerpc/sprs: Don't fail changed SPRs that are used by the test harness
Nicholas Piggin
npiggin at gmail.com
Tue Mar 5 13:14:03 AEDT 2024
On Fri Mar 1, 2024 at 9:15 PM AEST, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 26/02/2024 11.11, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > SPRs annotated with SPR_HARNESS can change between consecutive reads
> > because the test harness code has changed them. Avoid failing the
> > test in this case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > powerpc/sprs.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/powerpc/sprs.c b/powerpc/sprs.c
> > index 8253ea971..44edd0d7b 100644
> > --- a/powerpc/sprs.c
> > +++ b/powerpc/sprs.c
> > @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > if (before[i] >> 32)
> > pass = false;
> > }
> > - if (!(sprs[i].type & SPR_ASYNC) && (before[i] != after[i]))
> > + if (!(sprs[i].type & (SPR_HARNESS|SPR_ASYNC)) && (before[i] != after[i]))
> > pass = false;
> >
> > if (sprs[i].width == 32 && !(before[i] >> 32) && !(after[i] >> 32))
>
> I guess you could also squash this into the previous patch (to avoid
> problems with bisecting later?) ...
Yeah, I guess it doesn't make much sense to split out since lots of
other stuff changes in the previous patch too.
>
> Anyway:
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
Thanks,
Nick
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list