[PATCH v4 18/29] arm64: add POE signal support

Mark Brown broonie at kernel.org
Tue Jul 30 00:41:00 AEST 2024


On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 03:27:11PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 06:39:27PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Yes, though that would mean if we had to generate any register in there
> > we'd always have to generate at least as many entries as whatever number
> > it got assigned which depending on how much optionality ends up getting
> > used might be unfortunate.

> Ack, though it's only 150 bytes or so at most, so just zeroing it all
> (or as much as we know about) doesn't feel like a big cost.

> It depends how determined we are to squeeze the most out of the
> remaining space.

Indeed, I was more thinking about how it might scale as the number of
extensions grows rather than the current costs.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20240729/1d1afd8f/attachment.sig>


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list