[PATCH v4 04/29] arm64: disable trapping of POR_EL0 to EL2
Dave Martin
Dave.Martin at arm.com
Fri Jul 26 01:44:13 AEST 2024
Hi,
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 02:01:22PM +0100, Joey Gouly wrote:
> Allow EL0 or EL1 to access POR_EL0 without being trapped to EL2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly at arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> index b7afaa026842..df5614be4b70 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> @@ -184,12 +184,20 @@
> .Lset_pie_fgt_\@:
> mrs_s x1, SYS_ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1
> ubfx x1, x1, #ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1_S1PIE_SHIFT, #4
> - cbz x1, .Lset_fgt_\@
> + cbz x1, .Lset_poe_fgt_\@
>
> /* Disable trapping of PIR_EL1 / PIRE0_EL1 */
> orr x0, x0, #HFGxTR_EL2_nPIR_EL1
> orr x0, x0, #HFGxTR_EL2_nPIRE0_EL1
>
> +.Lset_poe_fgt_\@:
> + mrs_s x1, SYS_ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1
> + ubfx x1, x1, #ID_AA64MMFR3_EL1_S1POE_SHIFT, #4
> + cbz x1, .Lset_fgt_\@
> +
> + /* Disable trapping of POR_EL0 */
> + orr x0, x0, #HFGxTR_EL2_nPOR_EL0
Do I understand correctly that this is just to allow the host to access
its own POR_EL0, before (or unless) KVM starts up?
KVM always overrides all the EL2 trap controls while running a guest,
right? We don't want this bit still set when running in a guest just
because KVM doesn't know about POE yet.
(Hopefully this follows naturally from the way the KVM code works, but
my KVM-fu is a bit rusty.)
Also, what about POR_EL1? Do we have to reset that to something sane
(and so untrap it here), or it is sufficient if we never turn on POE
support in the host, via TCR2_EL1.POE?
[...]
Cheers
---Dave
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list