[PATCH 02/17] MIPS: sgi-ip27: make NODE_DATA() the same as on all other architectures

[Mike Rapoport]

On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 03:38:52PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 16:32:59 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 16.07.24 13:13, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt at kernel.org>
> > > 
> > > sgi-ip27 is the only system that defines NODE_DATA() differently than
> > > the rest of NUMA machines.
> > > 
> > > Add node_data array of struct pglist pointers that will point to
> > > __node_data[node]->pglist and redefine NODE_DATA() to use node_data
> > > array.
> > > 
> > > This will allow pulling declaration of node_data to the generic mm code
> > > in the next commit.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt at kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >   arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h | 5 ++++-
> > >   arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c         | 5 ++++-
> > >   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h
> > > index 08c36e50a860..629c3f290203 100644
> > > --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h
> > > +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h
> > > @@ -22,7 +22,10 @@ struct node_data {
> > >   
> > >   extern struct node_data *__node_data[];
> > >   
> > > -#define NODE_DATA(n)		(&__node_data[(n)]->pglist)
> > >   #define hub_data(n)		(&__node_data[(n)]->hub)
> > >   
> > > +extern struct pglist_data *node_data[];
> > > +
> > > +#define NODE_DATA(nid)		(node_data[nid])
> > > +
> > >   #endif /* _ASM_MACH_MMZONE_H */
> > > diff --git a/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c b/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c
> > > index b8ca94cfb4fe..c30ef6958b97 100644
> > > --- a/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c
> > > +++ b/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c
> > > @@ -34,8 +34,10 @@
> > >   #define SLOT_PFNSHIFT		(SLOT_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
> > >   #define PFN_NASIDSHFT		(NASID_SHFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
> > >   
> > > -struct node_data *__node_data[MAX_NUMNODES];
> > > +struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES];
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(node_data);
> > >   
> > > +struct node_data *__node_data[MAX_NUMNODES];
> > >   EXPORT_SYMBOL(__node_data);
> > >   
> > >   static u64 gen_region_mask(void)
> > > @@ -361,6 +363,7 @@ static void __init node_mem_init(nasid_t node)
> > >   	 */
> > >   	__node_data[node] = __va(slot_freepfn << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > >   	memset(__node_data[node], 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> > > +	node_data[node] = &__node_data[node]->pglist;
> > >   
> > >   	NODE_DATA(node)->node_start_pfn = start_pfn;
> > >   	NODE_DATA(node)->node_spanned_pages = end_pfn - start_pfn;  
> > 
> > I was assuming we could get rid of __node_data->pglist.
> > 
> > But now I am confused where that is actually set.
> 
> It looks nasty... 

Nasty indeed :)

> Cast in arch_refresh_nodedata() takes incoming pg_data_t * and casts it
> to the local version of struct node_data * which I think is this one
> 
> struct node_data {
> 	struct pglist_data pglist; (which is pg_data_t pglist)
> 	struct hub_data hub;
> };
> 
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10/source/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c#L432
> 
> Now that pg_data_t is allocated by 
> arch_alloc_nodedata() which might be fine (though types could be handled in a more
> readable fashion via some container_of() magic.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10/source/arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c#L427
> 
> However that call is:
> pg_data_t * __init arch_alloc_nodedata(int nid)
> {
> 	return memblock_alloc(sizeof(pg_data_t), SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> }
> 
> So doesn't seem to allocate enough space to me as should be sizeof(struct node_data)

Well, it's there to silence a compiler error (commit f8f9f21c7848 ("MIPS:
Fix build error for loongson64 and sgi-ip27")), but this is not a proper
fix :(
Luckily nothing calls cpumask_of_node() for offline nodes...
 
> Worth cleaning up whilst here?  Proper handling of types would definitely
> help.

Worth cleanup indeed, but I'd rather drop arch_alloc_nodedata() on MIPS
altogether.
 
> Jonathan

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.