[PATCH 1/4] soc: fsl: qbman: FSL_DPAA depends on COMPILE_TEST

Vladimir Oltean olteanv at gmail.com
Mon Jul 8 23:37:46 AEST 2024


On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 11:40:24AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Hello Vladimir,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 05:06:23PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 08:09:53PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
> > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > > 
> > > >> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c:3280:12: warning: stack frame size (16664) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dpaa_eth_probe' [-Wframe-larger-than]
> > >     3280 | static int dpaa_eth_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >          |            ^
> > >    1 warning generated.
> > > --
> > > >> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_ethtool.c:454:12: warning: stack frame size (8264) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dpaa_set_coalesce' [-Wframe-larger-than]
> > >      454 | static int dpaa_set_coalesce(struct net_device *dev,
> > >          |            ^
> > >    1 warning generated.
> > 
> > Arrays of NR_CPUS elements are what it probably doesn't like?
> 
> Can it use the number of online CPUs instead of NR_CPUS?

I don't see how, given that variable length arrays are something which
should be avoided in the kernel?


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list