[PATCH v2 01/15] arm64/mm: Make set_ptes() robust when OAs cross 48-bit boundary
David Hildenbrand
david at redhat.com
Fri Jan 26 06:32:13 AEDT 2024
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts at arm.com>
Since the high bits [51:48] of an OA are not stored contiguously in the
PTE, there is a theoretical bug in set_ptes(), which just adds PAGE_SIZE
to the pte to get the pte with the next pfn. This works until the pfn
crosses the 48-bit boundary, at which point we overflow into the upper
attributes.
Of course one could argue (and Matthew Wilcox has :) that we will never
see a folio cross this boundary because we only allow naturally aligned
power-of-2 allocation, so this would require a half-petabyte folio. So
its only a theoretical bug. But its better that the code is robust
regardless.
I've implemented pte_next_pfn() as part of the fix, which is an opt-in
core-mm interface. So that is now available to the core-mm, which will
be needed shortly to support forthcoming fork()-batching optimizations.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240125173534.1659317-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com
Fixes: 4a169d61c2ed ("arm64: implement the new page table range API")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/fdaeb9a5-d890-499a-92c8-d171df43ad01@arm.com/
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts at arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 79ce70fbb751c..52d0b0a763f16 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -341,6 +341,22 @@ static inline void __sync_cache_and_tags(pte_t pte, unsigned int nr_pages)
mte_sync_tags(pte, nr_pages);
}
+/*
+ * Select all bits except the pfn
+ */
+static inline pgprot_t pte_pgprot(pte_t pte)
+{
+ unsigned long pfn = pte_pfn(pte);
+
+ return __pgprot(pte_val(pfn_pte(pfn, __pgprot(0))) ^ pte_val(pte));
+}
+
+#define pte_next_pfn pte_next_pfn
+static inline pte_t pte_next_pfn(pte_t pte)
+{
+ return pfn_pte(pte_pfn(pte) + 1, pte_pgprot(pte));
+}
+
static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long __always_unused addr,
pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned int nr)
@@ -354,7 +370,7 @@ static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm,
if (--nr == 0)
break;
ptep++;
- pte_val(pte) += PAGE_SIZE;
+ pte = pte_next_pfn(pte);
}
}
#define set_ptes set_ptes
@@ -433,16 +449,6 @@ static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte)
return clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE));
}
-/*
- * Select all bits except the pfn
- */
-static inline pgprot_t pte_pgprot(pte_t pte)
-{
- unsigned long pfn = pte_pfn(pte);
-
- return __pgprot(pte_val(pfn_pte(pfn, __pgprot(0))) ^ pte_val(pte));
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
/*
* See the comment in include/linux/pgtable.h
--
2.43.0
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list