[PATCH 1/4] mm/vmalloc: allow arch-specific vmalloc_node overrides

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:32:53PM -0600, Maxwell Bland wrote:
> Present non-uniform use of __vmalloc_node and __vmalloc_node_range makes
> enforcing appropriate code and data seperation untenable on certain
> microarchitectures, as VMALLOC_START and VMALLOC_END are monolithic
> while the use of the vmalloc interface is non-monolithic: in particular,
> appropriate randomness in ASLR makes it such that code regions must fall
> in some region between VMALLOC_START and VMALLOC_end, but this
> necessitates that code pages are intermingled with data pages, meaning
> code-specific protections, such as arm64's PXNTable, cannot be
> performantly runtime enforced.

That's not actually true.  We have MODULE_START/END to separate them,
which is used by mips only for now.

> 
> The solution to this problem allows architectures to override the
> vmalloc wrapper functions by enforcing that the rest of the kernel does
> not reimplement __vmalloc_node by using __vmalloc_node_range with the
> same parameters as __vmalloc_node or provides a __weak tag to those
> functions using __vmalloc_node_range with parameters repeating those of
> __vmalloc_node.

I'm really not too happy about overriding the functions.  Especially
as the separation is a generally good idea and it would be good to
move everyone (or at least all modern architectures) over to a scheme
like this.