[PATCH] powerpc: Add gpr1 and fpu save/restore functions
Segher Boessenkool
segher at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Feb 13 04:59:06 AEDT 2024
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:46:19AM -0600, Timothy Pearson wrote:
> Interesting, that make sense.
>
> How should we proceed from the current situation? Bringing in libgcc seems
> like a fairly invasive change,
I have done it for *all* architectures some ten years ago. Never found
any problem.
> should we merge this to fix the current bug
> (cannot build ppc64 kernel in size-optimized mode) and start discussion on
> bringing in libgcc as the long-term fix across multiple architectures?
>
> My goal here is to not have to carry a downstream patch in perpetuity for
> our embedded Linux firmware, which needs to be compiled in size-optimized
> mode due to hardware Flash limitations.
There are better options than -Os, fwiw. Some --param's give smaller
*and* faster kernels. What exactly is best is heavily arch-dependent
though (as well as dependent on the application code, the kernel code in
this case) :-(
Segher
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list