[PATCH RFC/RFT v2 4/4] riscv: Stop emitting preventive sfence.vma for new userspace mappings with Svvptc
Andrea Parri
parri.andrea at gmail.com
Fri Feb 2 02:03:48 AEDT 2024
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 04:59:29PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> The preventive sfence.vma were emitted because new mappings must be made
> visible to the page table walker but Svvptc guarantees that xRET act as
> a fence, so no need to sfence.vma for the uarchs that implement this
> extension.
AFAIU, your first submission shows that you don't need that xRET property.
Similarly for other archs. What was rationale behind this Svvptc change?
> This allows to drastically reduce the number of sfence.vma emitted:
>
> * Ubuntu boot to login:
> Before: ~630k sfence.vma
> After: ~200k sfence.vma
>
> * ltp - mmapstress01
> Before: ~45k
> After: ~6.3k
>
> * lmbench - lat_pagefault
> Before: ~665k
> After: 832 (!)
>
> * lmbench - lat_mmap
> Before: ~546k
> After: 718 (!)
This Svvptc seems to move/add the "burden" of the synchronization to xRET:
Perhaps integrate the above counts w/ the perf gains in the cover letter?
Andrea
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list