[PATCH] powerpc/hv-gpci: Fix the hcall return value checks in single_gpci_request function
Akanksha J N
akanksha at linux.ibm.com
Thu Feb 1 17:47:25 AEDT 2024
On 31/01/24 4:56 pm, Kajol Jain wrote:
> Running event hv_gpci/dispatch_timebase_by_processor_processor_time_in_timebase_cycles,phys_processor_idx=0/
> in one of the system throws below error:
>
> ---Logs---
> # perf list | grep hv_gpci/dispatch_timebase_by_processor_processor_time_in_timebase_cycles
> hv_gpci/dispatch_timebase_by_processor_processor_time_in_timebase_cycles,phys_processor_idx=?/[Kernel PMU event]
>
>
> # perf stat -v -e hv_gpci/dispatch_timebase_by_processor_processor_time_in_timebase_cycles,phys_processor_idx=0/ sleep 2
> Using CPUID 00800200
> Control descriptor is not initialized
> Warning:
> hv_gpci/dispatch_timebase_by_processor_processor_time_in_timebase_cycles,phys_processor_idx=0/ event is not supported by the kernel.
> failed to read counter hv_gpci/dispatch_timebase_by_processor_processor_time_in_timebase_cycles,phys_processor_idx=0/
>
> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
>
> <not supported> hv_gpci/dispatch_timebase_by_processor_processor_time_in_timebase_cycles,phys_processor_idx=0/
>
> 2.000700771 seconds time elapsed
>
> The above error is because of the hcall failure as required
> permission "Enable Performance Information Collection" is not set.
> Based on current code, single_gpci_request function did not check the
> error type incase hcall fails and by default returns EINVAL. But we can
> have other reasons for hcall failures like H_AUTHORITY/H_PARAMETER for which
> we need to act accordingly.
> Fix this issue by adding new checks in the single_gpci_request function.
>
> Result after fix patch changes:
>
> # perf stat -e hv_gpci/dispatch_timebase_by_processor_processor_time_in_timebase_cycles,phys_processor_idx=0/ sleep 2
> Error:
> No permission to enable hv_gpci/dispatch_timebase_by_processor_processor_time_in_timebase_cycles,phys_processor_idx=0/ event.
>
> Fixes: 220a0c609ad1 ("powerpc/perf: Add support for the hv gpci (get performance counter info) interface")
> Reported-by: Akanksha J N <akanksha at linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kjain at linux.ibm.com>
Tested the patch on Power10 system, and the fix works fine.
# ./perf stat -v -e hv_gpci/dispatch_timebase_by_processor_processor_time_in_timebase_cycles,phys_processor_idx=1/ sleep 2
Control descriptor is not initialized
hv_gpci/dispatch_timebase_by_processor_processor_time_in_timebase_cycles,phys_processor_idx=1/: 0 2001246376 2001246376
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
0 hv_gpci/dispatch_timebase_by_processor_processor_time_in_timebase_cycles,phys_processor_idx=1/
2.001250313 seconds time elapsed
Tested-by: Akanksha J N <akanksha at linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/perf/hv-gpci.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-gpci.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-gpci.c
> index 27f18119fda1..101060facd81 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-gpci.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-gpci.c
> @@ -695,7 +695,17 @@ static unsigned long single_gpci_request(u32 req, u32 starting_index,
>
> ret = plpar_hcall_norets(H_GET_PERF_COUNTER_INFO,
> virt_to_phys(arg), HGPCI_REQ_BUFFER_SIZE);
> - if (ret) {
> +
> + /*
> + * ret value as 'H_PARAMETER' corresponds to 'GEN_BUF_TOO_SMALL',
> + * which means that the current buffer size cannot accommodate
> + * all the information and a partial buffer returned.
> + * Since in this function we are only accessing data for a given starting index,
> + * we don't need to accommodate whole data and can get required count by
> + * accessing very first entry.
> + * Hence hcall fails only incase the ret value is other than H_SUCCESS or H_PARAMETER.
> + */
> + if (ret && (ret != H_PARAMETER)) {
> pr_devel("hcall failed: 0x%lx\n", ret);
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -724,7 +734,7 @@ static u64 h_gpci_get_value(struct perf_event *event)
> event_get_offset(event),
> event_get_length(event),
> &count);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret && (ret != H_PARAMETER))
> return 0;
> return count;
> }
> @@ -759,6 +769,7 @@ static int h_gpci_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> u64 count;
> u8 length;
> + unsigned long ret;
>
> /* Not our event */
> if (event->attr.type != event->pmu->type)
> @@ -789,13 +800,23 @@ static int h_gpci_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> }
>
> /* check if the request works... */
> - if (single_gpci_request(event_get_request(event),
> + ret = single_gpci_request(event_get_request(event),
> event_get_starting_index(event),
> event_get_secondary_index(event),
> event_get_counter_info_version(event),
> event_get_offset(event),
> length,
> - &count)) {
> + &count);
> +
> + /*
> + * ret value as H_AUTHORITY implies that partition is not permitted to retrieve
> + * performance information, and required to set
> + * "Enable Performance Information Collection" option.
> + */
> + if (ret == H_AUTHORITY)
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + if (ret && (ret != H_PARAMETER)) {
> pr_devel("gpci hcall failed\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list