[PATCH v3 4/5] powerpc/vdso: Wire up getrandom() vDSO implementation on PPC32

[Christophe Leroy]

Le 30/08/2024 à 18:17, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 05:57:08PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> @@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ ifeq ($(uname_M),x86_64)
>>   TEST_GEN_PROGS += vdso_test_getrandom
>>   TEST_GEN_PROGS += vdso_test_chacha
>>   endif
>> +ifeq ($(ARCH),powerpc)
>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS += vdso_test_getrandom
>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS += vdso_test_chacha
>> +endif
> 
> FYI, as of [1], you should now be able to add powerpc to the filter list
> instead of having to duplicate a new stanza:
> 
> [1] https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fcrng%2Frandom.git%2Fcommit%2F%3Fid%3Dbbaae98172ed284fc0d5d39cc0d68f5d06164f06&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C4f51736c027a44cc7df908dcc90f46d6%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638606314665557021%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UtLdKTuEaZVhsguKa7kX1TBJ%2BvvQtl7DmU9hSBeThWo%3D&reserved=0

I'm a bit sceptic with that commit. IIUC you are changing the meaning of 
$ARCH. How does that fit with the $ARCH we give when we cross-build or 
with the ARCH which is set by the top-level Makefile in 
tools/testing/selftests ?

Also, wouldn't there be a way to use scripts/subarch.include instead of 
opencoding ?

Afterall, would it be a problem to build it even for i386 ? It should 
now be ignored anyway with your new commit f78280b1a3ce ("selftests: 
vDSO: skip getrandom test if architecture is unsupported")

Christophe