[PATCH v2 05/17] vdso: Avoid call to memset() by getrandom
Segher Boessenkool
segher at kernel.crashing.org
Fri Aug 30 04:02:41 AEST 2024
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 07:36:38PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 28/08/2024 à 19:25, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> >
> >>Not sure about static binaries, though: do those even use the VDSO?
> >
> >With "static binary" people usually mean "a binary not using any DSOs",
> >I think the VDSO is a DSO, also in this respect? As always, -static
> >builds are *way* less problematic (and faster and smaller :-) )
> >
>
> AFAIK on powerpc even static binaries use the vDSO, otherwise signals
> don't work.
How can that work? Non-dynamic binaries do not use ld.so (that is the
definition of a dynamic binary, even). So they cannot link (at runtime)
to any DSO (unless that is done manually?!)
Maybe there is something at a fixed offset in the vDSO, or something
like that? Is this documented somewhere?
Segher
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list