[PATCH v2 05/17] vdso: Avoid call to memset() by getrandom
Jason A. Donenfeld
Jason at zx2c4.com
Wed Aug 28 22:51:05 AEST 2024
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 07:33:13AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 01:18:34PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 05:53:30PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:08:19AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(params->reserved); i++)
> > > > > + params->reserved[i] = 0;
>
> This is a loop. With -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns, the default at
> -O2, this is optimised to
>
> memset(params->reserved, 0, ...);
>
> (which is perfectly fine, since memset is required to be there even
> for freestanding environments, this is documented!)
>
> > > -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns . But, as always, read up on it, see
> > > what it actually does (and how it avoids your problem, and mostly: learn
> > > what the actual problem *was*!)
> >
> > This might help with various loops, but it doesn't help with the matter
> > that this patch fixes, which is struct initialization. I just tried it
> > with the arm64 patch to no avail.
>
> It very much *does* help. Try harder? Maybe you typoed?
Scroll up and reread the original patch. You are confused. The loop is
what fixes the matter. It's struct initialization that generates the
memset.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list