[PATCH v5 29/30] kselftest/arm64: Add test case for POR_EL0 signal frame records
Joey Gouly
joey.gouly at arm.com
Fri Aug 23 01:11:12 AEST 2024
Ensure that we get signal context for POR_EL0 if and only if POE is present
on the system.
Copied from the TPIDR2 test.
Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly at arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah at kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan at linuxfoundation.org>
---
.../testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore | 1 +
.../arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c
diff --git tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore
index 1ce5b5eac386..b2f2bfd5c6aa 100644
--- tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore
+++ tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
mangle_*
fake_sigreturn_*
fpmr_*
+poe_*
sme_*
ssve_*
sve_*
diff --git tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..36bd9940ee05
--- /dev/null
+++ tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/poe_siginfo.c
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Arm Limited
+ *
+ * Verify that the POR_EL0 register context in signal frames is set up as
+ * expected.
+ */
+
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <ucontext.h>
+#include <sys/auxv.h>
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <asm/sigcontext.h>
+
+#include "test_signals_utils.h"
+#include "testcases.h"
+
+static union {
+ ucontext_t uc;
+ char buf[1024 * 128];
+} context;
+
+#define SYS_POR_EL0 "S3_3_C10_C2_4"
+
+static uint64_t get_por_el0(void)
+{
+ uint64_t val;
+
+ asm volatile(
+ "mrs %0, " SYS_POR_EL0 "\n"
+ : "=r"(val)
+ :
+ : );
+
+ return val;
+}
+
+int poe_present(struct tdescr *td, siginfo_t *si, ucontext_t *uc)
+{
+ struct _aarch64_ctx *head = GET_BUF_RESV_HEAD(context);
+ struct poe_context *poe_ctx;
+ size_t offset;
+ bool in_sigframe;
+ bool have_poe;
+ __u64 orig_poe;
+
+ have_poe = getauxval(AT_HWCAP2) & HWCAP2_POE;
+ if (have_poe)
+ orig_poe = get_por_el0();
+
+ if (!get_current_context(td, &context.uc, sizeof(context)))
+ return 1;
+
+ poe_ctx = (struct poe_context *)
+ get_header(head, POE_MAGIC, td->live_sz, &offset);
+
+ in_sigframe = poe_ctx != NULL;
+
+ fprintf(stderr, "POR_EL0 sigframe %s on system %s POE\n",
+ in_sigframe ? "present" : "absent",
+ have_poe ? "with" : "without");
+
+ td->pass = (in_sigframe == have_poe);
+
+ /*
+ * Check that the value we read back was the one present at
+ * the time that the signal was triggered.
+ */
+ if (have_poe && poe_ctx) {
+ if (poe_ctx->por_el0 != orig_poe) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "POR_EL0 in frame is %llx, was %llx\n",
+ poe_ctx->por_el0, orig_poe);
+ td->pass = false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+struct tdescr tde = {
+ .name = "POR_EL0",
+ .descr = "Validate that POR_EL0 is present as expected",
+ .timeout = 3,
+ .run = poe_present,
+};
--
2.25.1
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list