[PATCH v2 1/4] mm: Add optional close() to struct vm_special_mapping
Linus Torvalds
torvalds at linux-foundation.org
Tue Aug 20 06:15:49 AEST 2024
On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 12:51, Nathan Chancellor <nathan at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Yes, that appears to fix it for me. I don't have much to say about the
> rest but others might :)
Ok, I did a quick hack-job to remove that disgusting
install_special_mapping() legacy case.
With this, the old "install_special_mapping()" mess no longer exists,
but I haven't even attempted to compile the result, because I don't
have cross-compile environments for any of the affected architectures.
Except UML. I did at least build it there, but it's not like I tested it.
Adding architecture maintainers and more architecture lists to the
participants. It would be good to actually get this patch tested.
Context for newly added people:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wj9QPhG4CjiX8YLRC1wHj_Qs-T8wJi0WEhkfp0cszvB9w@mail.gmail.com/
NOTE! This patch is against my current tree, not the linux-next
changes. But it should entirely remove the case that caused problems
in linux-next.
Linus
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list