[PATCH 1/2] ACPI: extlog: Trace CPER Non-standard Section Body
Bjorn Helgaas
helgaas at kernel.org
Wed Aug 7 07:07:33 AEST 2024
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 04:43:40PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> In extlog_print(), trace "Non-standard Section Body" reported by firmware
> to the OS via Common Platform Error Record (CPER) (UEFI v2.10 Appendix N
> 2.3) to add further debug information and so to make ELOG log
> consistently with ghes_do_proc() (GHES).
>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fabio.m.de.francesco at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c
> index f055609d4b64..e025ae390737 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_extlog.c
> @@ -179,6 +179,12 @@ static int extlog_print(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
> if (gdata->error_data_length >= sizeof(*mem))
> trace_extlog_mem_event(mem, err_seq, fru_id, fru_text,
> (u8)gdata->error_severity);
> + } else {
> + void *err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
> +
> + trace_non_standard_event(sec_type, fru_id, fru_text,
> + gdata->error_severity, err,
> + gdata->error_data_length);
Kudos for making these two paths more similar.
Not specific to *this* patch, but it's annoying to try to find
tracepoint implementations. I guess it's
TRACE_EVENT(non_standard_event, ...) in include/ras/ras_event.h.
This has the same prototype as log_non_standard_event(), so
could extlog_print() be made a little bit more like ghes_do_proc() by
using log_non_standard_event() instead of trace_non_standard_event()
directly?
Bjorn
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list