[kvm-unit-tests PATCH v8 06/35] gitlab-ci: Run migration selftest on s390x and powerpc

Thomas Huth thuth at redhat.com
Tue Apr 16 17:55:29 AEST 2024


On 16/04/2024 09.18, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 11/04/2024 21.22, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 08/04/2024 18.06, Nico Boehr wrote:
>>> Quoting Nicholas Piggin (2024-04-05 10:35:07)
>>>> The migration harness is complicated and easy to break so CI will
>>>> be helpful.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   .gitlab-ci.yml      | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>>   s390x/unittests.cfg |  8 ++++++++
>>>>   2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.yml b/.gitlab-ci.yml
>>>> index ff34b1f50..60b3cdfd2 100644
>>>> --- a/.gitlab-ci.yml
>>>> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.yml
>>> [...]
>>>> @@ -135,7 +147,7 @@ build-riscv64:
>>>>   build-s390x:
>>>>    extends: .outoftree_template
>>>>    script:
>>>> - - dnf install -y qemu-system-s390x gcc-s390x-linux-gnu
>>>> + - dnf install -y qemu-system-s390x gcc-s390x-linux-gnu nmap-ncat
>>>>    - mkdir build
>>>>    - cd build
>>>>    - ../configure --arch=s390x --cross-prefix=s390x-linux-gnu-
>>>> @@ -161,6 +173,8 @@ build-s390x:
>>>>         sclp-1g
>>>>         sclp-3g
>>>>         selftest-setup
>>>> +      selftest-migration-kvm
>>>
>>> We're running under TCG in the Gitlab CI. I'm a little bit confused why
>>> we're running a KVM-only test here.
>>
>> The build-s390x job is TCG, indeed, but we have the "s390x-kvm" job that 
>> runs on a KVM-capable s390x host, so it could be added there?
> 
> I now gave it a try and it seems to work, so I updated this patch and pushed 
> it to the repository now.

Hmm, "selftest-migration" now was failing once here:

  https://gitlab.com/kvm-unit-tests/kvm-unit-tests/-/jobs/6633865591

Let's keep an eye on it, and if it is not stable enough, we might need to 
disable it in the CI again...

  Thomas




More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list