[PATCH] serial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq flood

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 1:15 AM Finn Thain <fthain at linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > > > > ---
> > > > (here is a good location for Cc:)
> > >
> > > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst indicats that it should
> > > be above the "---" separator together with Acked-by etc. Has this
> > > convention changed recently?
> >
> > I see, I will prepare a patch to discuss this aspect.
>
> If you are going to veto patches on the basis of rules yet unwritten, I
> think you risk turning the kernel development process into a lottery.

It's already a lottery, if you haven't noticed, i.e. it highly relies
on the style preferences of the maintainers and is yet undocumented (a
few years ago it was a new section introduced for closing this gap).

> How many other patches presently under review will need to be dropped just
> in case they don't conform with possible future rules?

What you are saying is pure speculation.

I rely on at least two things (besides already explained):
- the fact that Submitting Patches refers to the commit message
reduction due to the unnecessariness of some lines
- my experience and common sense (why duplicate the data?).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko