[PATCH V2] perf test: Fix parse-events tests to skip parametrized events

[Athira Rajeev]

> On 27-Sep-2023, at 4:07 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung at kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 10:37 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <arnaldo.melo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, 7:40 AM Athira Rajeev <atrajeev at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 08-Sep-2023, at 7:48 PM, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 08-Sep-2023, at 11:04 AM, Sachin Sant <sachinp at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 07-Sep-2023, at 10:29 PM, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Testcase "Parsing of all PMU events from sysfs" parse events for
>>>>>> all PMUs, and not just cpu. In case of powerpc, the PowerVM
>>>>>> environment supports events from hv_24x7 and hv_gpci PMU which
>>>>>> is of example format like below:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - hv_24x7/CPM_ADJUNCT_INST,domain=?,core=?/
>>>>>> - hv_gpci/event,partition_id=?/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The value for "?" needs to be filled in depending on system
>>>>>> configuration. It is better to skip these parametrized events
>>>>>> in this test as it is done in:
>>>>>> 'commit b50d691e50e6 ("perf test: Fix "all PMU test" to skip
>>>>>> parametrized events")' which handled a simialr instance with
>>>>>> "all PMU test".
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Fix parse-events test to skip parametrized events since
>>>>>> it needs proper setup of the parameters.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>>>> Addressed review comments from Ian. Updated size of
>>>>>> pmu event name variable and changed bool name which is
>>>>>> used to skip the test.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The patch fixes the reported issue.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 6.2: Parsing of all PMU events from sysfs                          : Ok
>>>>> 6.3: Parsing of given PMU events from sysfs                        : Ok
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp at linux.ibm.com>
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Sachin
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Sachin, Ian
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for testing the patch
>>> 
>>> Hi Arnaldo
>>> 
>>> Can you please check and pull this if it looks good to go .
>> 
>> 
>> Namhyung, can you please take a look?
> 
> Yep sure.  I think it needs to close the file when getline() fails.
> 
> Athira, can you please send v3 with that?

Sure, I will post V3 with this change

Athira
> 
> Thanks,
> Namhyung