[V2 2/2] tools/perf/tests: Fix object code reading to skip address that falls out of text section

Disha Goel disgoel at linux.ibm.com
Thu Sep 14 22:17:23 AEST 2023


On 07/09/23 10:15 pm, Athira Rajeev wrote:

> The testcase "Object code reading" fails in somecases
> for "fs_something" sub test as below:
>
>      Reading object code for memory address: 0xc008000007f0142c
>      File is: /lib/modules/6.5.0-rc3+/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko
>      On file address is: 0x1114cc
>      Objdump command is: objdump -z -d --start-address=0x11142c --stop-address=0x1114ac /lib/modules/6.5.0-rc3+/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko
>      objdump read too few bytes: 128
>      test child finished with -1
>
> This can alo be reproduced when running perf record with
> workload that exercises fs_something() code. In the test
> setup, this is exercising xfs code since root is xfs.
>
>      # perf record ./a.out
>      # perf report -v |grep "xfs.ko"
>        0.76% a.out /lib/modules/6.5.0-rc3+/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko  0xc008000007de5efc B [k] xlog_cil_commit
>        0.74% a.out  /lib/modules/6.5.0-rc3+/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko  0xc008000007d5ae18 B [k] xfs_btree_key_offset
>        0.74% a.out  /lib/modules/6.5.0-rc3+/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko  0xc008000007e11fd4 B [k] 0x0000000000112074
>
> Here addr "0xc008000007e11fd4" is not resolved. since this is a
> kernel module, its offset is from the DSO. Xfs module is loaded
> at 0xc008000007d00000
>
>     # cat /proc/modules | grep xfs
>      xfs 2228224 3 - Live 0xc008000007d00000
>
> And size is 0x220000. So its loaded between  0xc008000007d00000
> and 0xc008000007f20000. From objdump, text section is:
>      text 0010f7bc  0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000a0 2**4
>
> Hence perf captured ip maps to 0x112074 which is:
> ( ip - start of module ) + a0
>
> This offset 0x112074 falls out .text section which is up to 0x10f7bc
> In this case for module, the address 0xc008000007e11fd4 is pointing
> to stub instructions. This address range represents the module stubs
> which is allocated on module load and hence is not part of DSO offset.
>
> To address this issue in "object code reading", skip the sample if
> address falls out of text section and is within the module end.
> Use the "text_end" member of "struct dso" to do this check.
>
> To address this issue in "perf report", exploring an option of
> having stubs range as part of the /proc/kallsyms, so that perf
> report can resolve addresses in stubs range
>
> However this patch uses text_end to skip the stub range for
> Object code reading testcase.
>
> Reported-by: Disha Goel<disgoel at linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev<atrajeev at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
>   v1 -> v2:
>   Updated comment to add description on which arch has stub and
>   reason for skipping as suggested by Adrian

With this patch applied perf Object code reading test works correctly.

  26: Object code reading                                             : Ok

Tested-by: Disha Goel<disgoel at linux.ibm.com>

>   tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c b/tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c
> index ed3815163d1b..3cf6c2d42416 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/code-reading.c
> @@ -269,6 +269,18 @@ static int read_object_code(u64 addr, size_t len, u8 cpumode,
>   	if (addr + len > map__end(al.map))
>   		len = map__end(al.map) - addr;
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * Some architectures (ex: powerpc) have stubs (trampolines) in kernel
> +	 * modules to manage long jumps. Check if the ip offset falls in stubs
> +	 * sections for kernel modules. And skip module address after text end
> +	 */
> +	if (strstr(dso->long_name, ".ko")) {
> +		if (al.addr > dso->text_end) {
> +			pr_debug("skipping the module address %#"PRIx64" after text end\n", al.addr);
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>   	/* Read the object code using perf */
>   	ret_len = dso__data_read_offset(dso, maps__machine(thread__maps(thread)),
>   					al.addr, buf1, len);
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20230914/9cf0cc31/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list