Ping? Re: [PATCH rc] kvm: Prevent compiling virt/kvm/vfio.c unless VFIO is selected

[Alex Williamson]

On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:31:03 -0800
Sean Christopherson <seanjc at google.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 06:21:42PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:  
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > > index 454e9295970c..a65b2513f8cd 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> > > @@ -289,16 +289,12 @@ void vfio_combine_iova_ranges(struct rb_root_cached *root, u32 cur_nodes,
> > >  /*
> > >   * External user API
> > >   */
> > > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP)
> > >  struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file);
> > > +
> > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_GROUP)
> > >  bool vfio_file_is_group(struct file *file);
> > >  bool vfio_file_has_dev(struct file *file, struct vfio_device *device);
> > >  #else
> > > -static inline struct iommu_group *vfio_file_iommu_group(struct file *file)
> > > -{
> > > -       return NULL;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > >  static inline bool vfio_file_is_group(struct file *file)
> > >  {
> > >         return false;
> > >   
> > 
> > So you symbol get on a symbol that can never be defined? Still says to
> > me the kconfig needs fixing :|  
> 
> Yeah, I completely agree, and if KVM didn't already rely on this horrific
> behavior and there wasn't a more complete overhaul in-flight, I wouldn't suggest
> this.
> 
> I'll send the KVM Kconfig/Makefile cleanups from my "Hide KVM internals from others"
> series separately (which is still the bulk of the series) so as to prioritize
> getting the cleanups landed.
> 

Seems we have agreement and confirmation of the fix above as an
interim, do you want to post it formally and I can pick it up for
v6.7-rc?  Thanks,

Alex