[PATCH v2 1/6] powerpc/64s: move stack SLB pinning out of line from _switch

Nicholas Piggin npiggin at gmail.com
Mon May 15 14:45:38 AEST 2023


The large hunk of SLB pinning in _switch asm code makes it more
difficult to see everything else that's going on. Also the code
footprint of the increasingly less important path is likely to
take up icache footprint and fetch.

Move it out of line.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S | 113 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
index 1bf1121e17f1..2e02834c5824 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -105,6 +105,64 @@ flush_branch_caches:
 	.endr
 
 	blr
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64S_HASH_MMU
+.balign 32
+/*
+ * New stack pointer in r8, old stack pointer in r1, must not clobber r3
+ */
+pin_stack_slb:
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+	clrrdi	r6,r8,28	/* get its ESID */
+	clrrdi	r9,r1,28	/* get current sp ESID */
+FTR_SECTION_ELSE
+	clrrdi	r6,r8,40	/* get its 1T ESID */
+	clrrdi	r9,r1,40	/* get current sp 1T ESID */
+ALT_MMU_FTR_SECTION_END_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT)
+	clrldi.	r0,r6,2		/* is new ESID c00000000? */
+	cmpd	cr1,r6,r9	/* or is new ESID the same as current ESID? */
+	cror	eq,4*cr1+eq,eq
+	beq	2f		/* if yes, don't slbie it */
+
+	/* Bolt in the new stack SLB entry */
+	ld	r7,KSP_VSID(r4)	/* Get new stack's VSID */
+	oris	r0,r6,(SLB_ESID_V)@h
+	ori	r0,r0,(SLB_NUM_BOLTED-1)@l
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+	li	r9,MMU_SEGSIZE_1T	/* insert B field */
+	oris	r6,r6,(MMU_SEGSIZE_1T << SLBIE_SSIZE_SHIFT)@h
+	rldimi	r7,r9,SLB_VSID_SSIZE_SHIFT,0
+END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT)
+
+	/* Update the last bolted SLB.  No write barriers are needed
+	 * here, provided we only update the current CPU's SLB shadow
+	 * buffer.
+	 */
+	ld	r9,PACA_SLBSHADOWPTR(r13)
+	li	r12,0
+	std	r12,SLBSHADOW_STACKESID(r9)	/* Clear ESID */
+	li	r12,SLBSHADOW_STACKVSID
+	STDX_BE	r7,r12,r9			/* Save VSID */
+	li	r12,SLBSHADOW_STACKESID
+	STDX_BE	r0,r12,r9			/* Save ESID */
+
+	/* No need to check for MMU_FTR_NO_SLBIE_B here, since when
+	 * we have 1TB segments, the only CPUs known to have the errata
+	 * only support less than 1TB of system memory and we'll never
+	 * actually hit this code path.
+	 */
+
+	isync
+	slbie	r6
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+	slbie	r6		/* Workaround POWER5 < DD2.1 issue */
+END_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
+	slbmte	r7,r0
+	isync
+2:	blr
+	.size pin_stack_slb,.-pin_stack_slb
+#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_64S_HASH_MMU */
+
 #else
 #define FLUSH_COUNT_CACHE
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 */
@@ -182,59 +240,12 @@ _GLOBAL(_switch)
 #endif
 
 	ld	r8,KSP(r4)	/* new stack pointer */
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64S_HASH_MMU
 BEGIN_MMU_FTR_SECTION
-	b	2f
-END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(MMU_FTR_TYPE_RADIX)
-BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
-	clrrdi	r6,r8,28	/* get its ESID */
-	clrrdi	r9,r1,28	/* get current sp ESID */
-FTR_SECTION_ELSE
-	clrrdi	r6,r8,40	/* get its 1T ESID */
-	clrrdi	r9,r1,40	/* get current sp 1T ESID */
-ALT_MMU_FTR_SECTION_END_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT)
-	clrldi.	r0,r6,2		/* is new ESID c00000000? */
-	cmpd	cr1,r6,r9	/* or is new ESID the same as current ESID? */
-	cror	eq,4*cr1+eq,eq
-	beq	2f		/* if yes, don't slbie it */
-
-	/* Bolt in the new stack SLB entry */
-	ld	r7,KSP_VSID(r4)	/* Get new stack's VSID */
-	oris	r0,r6,(SLB_ESID_V)@h
-	ori	r0,r0,(SLB_NUM_BOLTED-1)@l
-BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
-	li	r9,MMU_SEGSIZE_1T	/* insert B field */
-	oris	r6,r6,(MMU_SEGSIZE_1T << SLBIE_SSIZE_SHIFT)@h
-	rldimi	r7,r9,SLB_VSID_SSIZE_SHIFT,0
-END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT)
-
-	/* Update the last bolted SLB.  No write barriers are needed
-	 * here, provided we only update the current CPU's SLB shadow
-	 * buffer.
-	 */
-	ld	r9,PACA_SLBSHADOWPTR(r13)
-	li	r12,0
-	std	r12,SLBSHADOW_STACKESID(r9)	/* Clear ESID */
-	li	r12,SLBSHADOW_STACKVSID
-	STDX_BE	r7,r12,r9			/* Save VSID */
-	li	r12,SLBSHADOW_STACKESID
-	STDX_BE	r0,r12,r9			/* Save ESID */
-
-	/* No need to check for MMU_FTR_NO_SLBIE_B here, since when
-	 * we have 1TB segments, the only CPUs known to have the errata
-	 * only support less than 1TB of system memory and we'll never
-	 * actually hit this code path.
-	 */
-
-	isync
-	slbie	r6
-BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
-	slbie	r6		/* Workaround POWER5 < DD2.1 issue */
-END_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
-	slbmte	r7,r0
-	isync
-2:
-#endif /* CONFIG_PPC_64S_HASH_MMU */
+	bl	pin_stack_slb
+END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_TYPE_RADIX)
+#endif
 
 	clrrdi	r7, r8, THREAD_SHIFT	/* base of new stack */
 	/* Note: this uses SWITCH_FRAME_SIZE rather than INT_FRAME_SIZE
-- 
2.40.1



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list