[PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems

[Timothy Pearson]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Ellerman" <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
> To: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson at raptorengineering.com>, "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson at raptorengineering.com>
> Cc: "kvm" <kvm at vger.kernel.org>, "linuxppc-dev" <linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 5:33:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems

> Timothy Pearson <tpearson at raptorengineering.com> writes:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson at raptorengineering.com>
>>> To: "Michael Ellerman" <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
>>> Cc: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson at raptorengineering.com>, "kvm"
>>> <kvm at vger.kernel.org>, "linuxppc-dev"
>>> <linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 1:28:20 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems
>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Michael Ellerman" <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
>>>> To: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson at raptorengineering.com>, "kvm"
>>>> <kvm at vger.kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: "linuxppc-dev" <linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 5:40:01 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Reenable VFIO support on POWER systems
>>> 
>>>> Timothy Pearson <tpearson at raptorengineering.com> writes:
>>>>> This patch series reenables VFIO support on POWER systems.  It
>>>>> is based on Alexey Kardashevskiys's patch series, rebased and
>>>>> successfully tested under QEMU with a Marvell PCIe SATA controller
>>>>> on a POWER9 Blackbird host.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy (3):
>>>>>   powerpc/iommu: Add "borrowing" iommu_table_group_ops
>>>>>   powerpc/pci_64: Init pcibios subsys a bit later
>>>>>   powerpc/iommu: Add iommu_ops to report capabilities and allow blocking
>>>>>     domains
>>>> 
>>>> As sent the patches had lost Alexey's authorship (no From: line), I
>>>> fixed it up when applying so the first 3 are authored by Alexey.
>>>> 
>>>> cheers
>>> 
>>> Thanks for catching that, it wasn't intentional.  Probably used a wrong Git
>>> command...
>>
>> Just wanted to touch base on the patches, since they're still listed as Under
>> Review on patchwork.  Are we good to go for the 6.4 merge window?
> 
> They've been in my next (and so linux-next), since last week. I just
> haven't updated patchwork yet.
> 
> So yeah they are on track to go into mainline during the v6.4 merge window.
> 
> cheers

Sounds great, thanks!  Saw them in the next tree but wasn't sure if the patchwork status was more reflective of overall status.