[PATCH v5 26/33] nios2: Convert __pte_free_tlb() to use ptdescs

Dinh Nguyen dinguyen at kernel.org
Wed Jun 28 06:05:26 AEST 2023

On 6/27/23 14:56, Vishal Moola wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 12:14 PM Guenter Roeck <linux at roeck-us.net> wrote:
>> On 6/27/23 12:10, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 6/27/23 10:42, Vishal Moola wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:47 PM Guenter Roeck <linux at roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 01:57:38PM -0700, Vishal Moola (Oracle) wrote:
>>>>>> Part of the conversions to replace pgtable constructor/destructors with
>>>>>> ptdesc equivalents.
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola at gmail.com>
>>>>>> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt at kernel.org>
>>>>> This patch causes all nios2 builds to fail.
>>>> It looks like you tried to apply this patch on its own. This patch depends
>>>> on patches 01-12 of this patchset to compile properly. I've cross-compiled
>>>> this architecture and it worked, but let me know if something fails
>>>> when its applied on top of those patches (or the rest of the patchset).
>>> No, I did not try to apply this patch on its own. I tried to build yesterday's
>>> pending-fixes branch of linux-next.
>> A quick check shows that the build fails with next-20230627. See log below.
> Ah it looks like this one slipped into -next on its own somehow? Stephen, please
> drop this patch from -next; it shouldn't be in without the rest of the
> patchset which
> I intend to have Andrew take through the mm tree.

I apologize, but I queue this patch up for Linus and it's been pulled 
for this merge window. I didn't realize you were going to take this 
patchset through another tree.

Sorry about that.


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list