[PATCH 15/17] perf tests task_analyzer: fix bad substitution ${$1}
Aditya Gupta
adityag at linux.ibm.com
Sat Jun 24 04:19:22 AEST 2023
Hello, Namhyung,
On 23/06/23 04:55, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Ok, I found two problems.
>
> ...
>
> The first one is related to this message. It couldn't find the script
> (task-analyzer.py) because PERF_EXEC_PATH is not set.
> Running with --exec-path=$PWD was ok, but I got a segfault.
>
> The other problem is in set_regs_in_dict(). It tries to capture
> register values in the sample and save them to a dictionary.
> The sample doesn't have registers so it should have no problem.
> But the 'bf' was not initialized properly when size is 0, and it led
> PyUnicode_FromString() returning NULL.
>
> After the changes, it ran ok:
>
> $ sudo ./perf test -v task
> 116: perf script task-analyzer tests :
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 204088
> PASS: "test_basic"
> PASS: "test_ns_rename"
> PASS: "test_ms_filtertasks_highlight"
> PASS: "test_extended_times_timelimit_limittasks"
> PASS: "test_summary"
> PASS: "test_summaryextended"
> PASS: "test_summaryonly"
> PASS: "test_extended_times_summary_ns"
> PASS: "test_extended_times_summary_ns"
> PASS: "test_csv"
> PASS: "test_csvsummary"
> PASS: "test_csv_extended_times"
> PASS: "test_csvsummary_extended"
> test child finished with 0
> ---- end ----
> perf script task-analyzer tests: Ok
This is interesting. I did not encounter these earlier.
> I'll send the fixes soon.
>
Thanks for fixing it.
>>> You can try the perf-tools-next branch in the perf/perft-tools-next.git repo.
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git
>>>
>>> $ make clean all
>>> $ sudo ./perf test -v task
>>>
I tested with the steps provided, i.e.. clone, /*apply patch 15 (added
this step myself)*/, clean, make, ./perf test -v test. But still- test
passed:
'''
~/temp_clones/perf-tools-next/tools/perf git:(master) sudo ./perf test
-v test
...
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 75261
PASS: "test_basic"
PASS: "test_ns_rename"
PASS: "test_ms_filtertasks_highlight"
PASS: "test_extended_times_timelimit_limittasks"
PASS: "test_summary"
PASS: "test_summaryextended"
PASS: "test_summaryonly"
PASS: "test_extended_times_summary_ns"
PASS: "test_extended_times_summary_ns"
PASS: "test_csv"
PASS: "test_csvsummary"
PASS: "test_csv_extended_times"
PASS: "test_csvsummary_extended"
test child finished with 0
---- end ----
'''
Maybe my environment had that other things set in a way that, I did not
face any issue (I don't recall doing any special thing with my
environment though, and these patches have been tested multiple times by
more people also).
But thanks for your efforts to debug and fix the issue.
Thanks,
- AdityaG
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list