[kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/2] Link with "-z noexecstack" to avoid warning from newer versions of ld

[Thomas Huth]

On 23/06/2023 16.24, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2023, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> Newer versions of ld (from binutils 2.40) complain on s390x and x86:
>>
>>   ld: warning: s390x/cpu.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies
>>                executable stack
>>   ld: NOTE: This behaviour is deprecated and will be removed in a
>>             future version of the linker
>>
>> We can silence these warnings by using "-z noexecstack" for linking
>> (which should not have any real influence on the kvm-unit-tests since
>> the information from the ELF header is not used here anyway, so it's
>> just cosmetics).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   Makefile | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>> index 0e5d85a1..20f7137c 100644
>> --- a/Makefile
>> +++ b/Makefile
>> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ CFLAGS += -Woverride-init -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes
>>   
>>   autodepend-flags = -MMD -MF $(dir $*).$(notdir $*).d
>>   
>> -LDFLAGS += -nostdlib
>> +LDFLAGS += -nostdlib -z noexecstack
> 
> Drat, the pull request[1] I sent to Paolo yesterday only fixes x86[2].

Oops, sorry, I did not notice that patch in my overcrowded mailboxes (or 
forgot about it during KVM forum...) :-/

> Paolo, want me to redo the pull request to drop the x86-specific patch?

I can also respin my patch on top of your series later ... the problem 
currently also only seems to happen on x86 and s390x, on ppc64 and aarch64, 
the linker does not complain ... so maybe it's even better to do it 
per-architecture only anyway? Opinions?

  Thomas