[PATCH v2 03/12] arm: adjust_pte() use pte_offset_map_nolock()
Hugh Dickins
hughd at google.com
Tue Jun 20 17:43:50 AEST 2023
Instead of pte_lockptr(), use the recently added pte_offset_map_nolock()
in adjust_pte(): because it gives the not-locked ptl for precisely that
pte, which the caller can then safely lock; whereas pte_lockptr() is not
so tightly coupled, because it dereferences the pmd pointer again.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd at google.com>
---
arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c b/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c
index ca5302b0b7ee..7cb125497976 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/fault-armv.c
@@ -117,11 +117,10 @@ static int adjust_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
* must use the nested version. This also means we need to
* open-code the spin-locking.
*/
- pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, address);
+ pte = pte_offset_map_nolock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, address, &ptl);
if (!pte)
return 0;
- ptl = pte_lockptr(vma->vm_mm, pmd);
do_pte_lock(ptl);
ret = do_adjust_pte(vma, address, pfn, pte);
--
2.35.3
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list