[RFC PATCH] powerpc/ftrace: Create a dummy stackframe to fix stack unwind
Naveen N Rao
naveen at kernel.org
Thu Jun 15 23:51:13 AEST 2023
With ppc64 -mprofile-kernel and ppc32 -pg, profiling instructions to
call into ftrace are emitted right at function entry. The instruction
sequence used is minimal to reduce overhead. Crucially, a stackframe is
not created for the function being traced. This breaks stack unwinding
since the function being traced does not have a stackframe for itself.
As such, it never shows up in the backtrace:
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing # echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/stack_tracer_enabled
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing # cat stack_trace
Depth Size Location (17 entries)
----- ---- --------
0) 4144 32 ftrace_call+0x4/0x44
1) 4112 432 get_page_from_freelist+0x26c/0x1ad0
2) 3680 496 __alloc_pages+0x290/0x1280
3) 3184 336 __folio_alloc+0x34/0x90
4) 2848 176 vma_alloc_folio+0xd8/0x540
5) 2672 272 __handle_mm_fault+0x700/0x1cc0
6) 2400 208 handle_mm_fault+0xf0/0x3f0
7) 2192 80 ___do_page_fault+0x3e4/0xbe0
8) 2112 160 do_page_fault+0x30/0xc0
9) 1952 256 data_access_common_virt+0x210/0x220
10) 1696 400 0xc00000000f16b100
11) 1296 384 load_elf_binary+0x804/0x1b80
12) 912 208 bprm_execve+0x2d8/0x7e0
13) 704 64 do_execveat_common+0x1d0/0x2f0
14) 640 160 sys_execve+0x54/0x70
15) 480 64 system_call_exception+0x138/0x350
16) 416 416 system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4
Fix this by having ftrace create a dummy stackframe for the function
being traced. Since this is only relevant when ftrace is active, we nop
out the instruction to store LR in the LR save area in the profiling
instruction sequence on ppc32 (and in ppc64 with older gcc versions).
Instead, in ftrace, we store LR in the LR save area of the previous
stackframe, and create a minimal stackframe to represent the function
being traced. With this, backtraces now capture the function being
traced:
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing # cat stack_trace
Depth Size Location (17 entries)
----- ---- --------
0) 3888 32 _raw_spin_trylock+0x8/0x70
1) 3856 576 get_page_from_freelist+0x26c/0x1ad0
2) 3280 64 __alloc_pages+0x290/0x1280
3) 3216 336 __folio_alloc+0x34/0x90
4) 2880 176 vma_alloc_folio+0xd8/0x540
5) 2704 416 __handle_mm_fault+0x700/0x1cc0
6) 2288 96 handle_mm_fault+0xf0/0x3f0
7) 2192 48 ___do_page_fault+0x3e4/0xbe0
8) 2144 192 do_page_fault+0x30/0xc0
9) 1952 608 data_access_common_virt+0x210/0x220
10) 1344 16 0xc0000000334bbb50
11) 1328 416 load_elf_binary+0x804/0x1b80
12) 912 64 bprm_execve+0x2d8/0x7e0
13) 848 176 do_execveat_common+0x1d0/0x2f0
14) 672 192 sys_execve+0x54/0x70
15) 480 64 system_call_exception+0x138/0x350
16) 416 416 system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4
This results in two additional stores in the ftrace entry code, but
produces reliable backtraces. Note that this change now aligns with
other architectures (arm64, s390, x86).
Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao <naveen at kernel.org>
---
This applies atop the below RFC patchset:
http://lore.kernel.org/cover.1686151854.git.naveen@kernel.org
- Naveen
arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 8 +++++---
arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_entry.S | 11 ++++++++---
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index a03aa4fd7a08ba..3f090f037d8ef5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -229,13 +229,15 @@ int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
/* Expected sequence: 'mflr r0', 'stw r0,4(r1)', 'bl _mcount' */
ret = ftrace_validate_inst(ip - 8, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_MFLR(_R0)));
if (!ret)
- ret = ftrace_validate_inst(ip - 4, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_STW(_R0, _R1, 4)));
+ ret = ftrace_modify_code(ip - 4, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_STW(_R0, _R1, 4)),
+ ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_NOP()));
} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPROFILE_KERNEL)) {
/* Expected sequence: 'mflr r0', ['std r0,16(r1)'], 'bl _mcount' */
ret = ftrace_validate_inst(ip - 4, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_MFLR(_R0)));
if (ret) {
- ret = ftrace_validate_inst(ip - 4, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_STD(_R0, _R1, 16)));
- ret |= ftrace_validate_inst(ip - 8, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_MFLR(_R0)));
+ ret = ftrace_validate_inst(ip - 8, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_MFLR(_R0)));
+ ret |= ftrace_modify_code(ip - 4, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_STD(_R0, _R1, 16)),
+ ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_NOP()));
}
} else {
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_entry.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_entry.S
index bab3ab1368a33f..05e981fb526c2e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_entry.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_entry.S
@@ -33,6 +33,11 @@
* and then arrange for the ftrace function to be called.
*/
.macro ftrace_regs_entry allregs
+ /* Create a minimal stack frame for representing B */
+ PPC_STLU r1, -STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE(r1)
+ /* Save the original return address in A's stack frame */
+ PPC_STL r0, LRSAVE+STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE(r1)
+
/* Create our stack frame + pt_regs */
PPC_STLU r1,-SWITCH_FRAME_SIZE(r1)
@@ -41,8 +46,6 @@
SAVE_GPRS(3, 10, r1)
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
- /* Save the original return address in A's stack frame */
- std r0, LRSAVE+SWITCH_FRAME_SIZE(r1)
/* Ok to continue? */
lbz r3, PACA_FTRACE_ENABLED(r13)
cmpdi r3, 0
@@ -77,6 +80,8 @@
mflr r7
/* Save it as pt_regs->nip */
PPC_STL r7, _NIP(r1)
+ /* Also save it in B's stackframe header for proper unwind */
+ PPC_STL r7, LRSAVE+SWITCH_FRAME_SIZE(r1)
/* Save the read LR in pt_regs->link */
PPC_STL r0, _LINK(r1)
@@ -142,7 +147,7 @@
#endif
/* Pop our stack frame */
- addi r1, r1, SWITCH_FRAME_SIZE
+ addi r1, r1, SWITCH_FRAME_SIZE+STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE
#ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH_64
/* Based on the cmpd above, if the NIP was altered handle livepatch */
base-commit: bd517a8442b6c6646a136421cd4c1b95bf4ce32b
prerequisite-patch-id: b953231ea1102dee0e99a793e2b0a4cc3524d6e4
prerequisite-patch-id: 029435b7efc8ac3e9a49fd253c3a32c1ae6b625d
prerequisite-patch-id: d54692b0a2bf9d8d4230ad9d529ca5cca9f064fa
prerequisite-patch-id: f35d59616da6d295ebb49146b5e5000d63bc2e2d
prerequisite-patch-id: 7476dc63da245d21085fc1d661fc913012a2829d
prerequisite-patch-id: 2dfadfbafe18b69462284402ed2bbd20ef3627d3
prerequisite-patch-id: 0550450ddc1fa88ec7e00356799c66dbf31aed95
prerequisite-patch-id: 9a4c24553f536cde60636b2d91cd24f6127d9978
prerequisite-patch-id: af2d0864837e4e2fb85604fd6519a894a086fd22
prerequisite-patch-id: 8695c750ac80fac717e390ea8868cfd2a7fac22e
prerequisite-patch-id: 75675def2fb28145ae98ad21636cbe09b6174c57
prerequisite-patch-id: 66991e58b939a95ee69704f329aaa69de92b5f5c
prerequisite-patch-id: a86977fec45531c24925f66691c2a9624596a943
prerequisite-patch-id: f581bcc4ff26bdee41ad2e79acde16424faa8c76
prerequisite-patch-id: 423e0ef649173547fa1d16b5763883e5946469f2
--
2.40.1
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list