[PATCH] powerpc/secvar: Use u64 in secvar_operations

Andrew Donnellan ajd at linux.ibm.com
Tue Jan 17 17:37:37 AEDT 2023


On Thu, 2023-01-12 at 13:38 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> There's no reason for secvar_operations to use uint64_t vs the more
> common kernel type u64.
> 
> The types are compatible, but they require different printk format
> strings which can lead to confusion.
> 
> Change all the secvar related routines to use u64.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au>

We're going to include this patch in the next revision of our dynamic
key management series.

-- 
Andrew Donnellan    OzLabs, ADL Canberra
ajd at linux.ibm.com   IBM Australia Limited


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list